Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Suma who wrote (47112)	9/5/2004 10:51:48 AM
From: ChinuSFO	Respond to of 81568

The punch lines are the last 4 lines. Strong men who won’t ask directions By Ellen Goodman, Globe Staff September 5, 2004 <font size=3> NEW YORK IF NOTHING else, the Republican National Convention is bound to revive all those jokes about men and driving. "Why does it take a million sperm to fertilize one egg? They won't ask directions." "Why were the Jews lost in the desert for 40 years? Moses wouldn't stop to ask directions." You know the drill. These were the jokes about boys who grew up as if they had MapQuest in their DNA hard drive. By the time men got behind the wheel -- of the car or the country -- they had to know where they were going. Or at least act as if they did. Now the line is back, only without the punch. This year's RNC was the RMC, the Real Men Convention. The polls show that half of all Americans think the country is on the wrong track. But the delegates and speakers here all praised George W. for being the President Who Wouldn't Ask Directions. Arnold Schwarzenegger, the "once-scrawny boy from Austria," cited his two role models as John Wayne and Richard Nixon before he said what he admired most about Bush: "perseverance." Leadership, said Arnold, is "about making decisions you think are right and then standing behind those decisions." And in case anyone didn't get it, he then teased those who disagreed with the president's rosy jobs scenario by reprising his line: "Don't be economic girlie men." Zell Miller, the angry old Democrat of the Republican Party -- no, you can't give him back -- sounded like he was suffering from the side effects of Cialis when he called Kerry a "bowl of mush" and praised the president's, uh, "backbone." And Dick Cheney twisted Kerry's promise to run "a more effective, more thoughtful, more strategic, more proactive, more sensitive war on terror" into a slam against the Democrat as, gulp, a Sensitive Guy. "He talks about leading a more sensitive war on terror," sneered the vice president, "as though Al Qaeda will be impressed with our softer side." The words "resolute," "strong," and "steadfast" littered Madison Square Garden like posters of "Four More Years." The phrase repeated by delegate after delegate with spooky consistency was: "He does what he says he's going to do." It didn't seem to matter what he did as much as the fact that he said he'd do it. It didn't seem to matter as much where he was leading as that he was leading. The president put it best Thursday night when he said, "Even when we don't agree, at least you know what I believe and where I stand." The RMC didn't just want to portray the combat veteran Kerry as the wimp and the National Guardsman Bush as the warrior. By the time the balloons dropped, it was clear that Republicans think that this may become a contest between a man who swaggers -- "which in Texas is called `walking' " -- and a man who sways. They believe we'll pick the swagger. In times of anxiety, many do gravitate to a very traditional, even archetypal image of male strength. Whatever the gender jokes, it isn't just men. There are also women in the passenger seat who are only comfortable with a man who behaves as if he knows where he's going. Leadership in itself is neither good nor bad. The paradox of leadership is that the skills can be utterly disconnected from the goals. You can be led by Hannibal -- there was a guy with an elephant problem -- straight into the mountains. But Bush's leadership is paradoxical for another reason. He's seen as unwavering because he simply disavows any turns in the road. In a powerful acceptance speech rife with distortions, the same resolute, persevering, backboned president who went into Iraq claiming weapons of mass destruction now defends the war as one of liberation. In Bush's head, Al Qaeda and Saddam are still connected. And anyone who worries that Iraq is breeding more terrorists than it had to begin with is suffering from what Zell Miller called "analysis paralysis." My father used to describe a friend as "often wrong, but never in doubt." On the last day of the convention, Dick Cheney described his friend to a breakfast of Ohio delegates as "decisive." "He doesn't waffle, he doesn't agonize," said the vice president. "That's exactly what we need in a president. We don't need indecision or confusion." Well, I am sure that Dick Cheney isn't asking me for directions. But guess what? <font color=red>It's not George Bush's decisiveness that's the problem. It's his decisions. <font color=black> boston.com

To: Suma who wrote (47112)	9/5/2004 11:00:31 AM
From: ChinuSFO	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

I am particularly interested in knowing how John Lehman's signature got on there. We know that Mr. Lehman was Reagan's Navy Secretary. We also know that Kerry was very active in investigating the Iran Contra (who says he does not have a Senate record). Did the Reaganites try to silence his investigation by giving him that citation. And we know that he refused to be silenced since he went all out. So I am interested to find out if there was an effort by the Reagan Administration to muzzle the Iran Contra through bribes etc. But I doubt that this investigation would be completed before the elections like many others such as the WMD intelligence fiasco etc. I think in the end we all have to decide whether we want all this secrecy. bribing, telling lies etc. to continue for the next 4 years or would we want this country to go back to the prosperity years of the 1990's. This "talk only" war thing is getting too much without ever confronting the war head on and putting it behind us. It has been all talk and no action on Bush's part. THE TALIBAN HAS STARTED TO COME BACK INTO AFGHANISTAN. What victory is this?