Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Proof that John Kerry is Unfit for Command -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AuBug who wrote (8262)	9/7/2004 11:21:00 AM
From: Andrew N. Cothran	Respond to of 27181

LOSING TO THE 800-LB GORILLA: One of the reasons this campaign is going to get even uglier is because John Kerry is currently sitting in a pretty tight box right now. Early on the Kerry campaign made the (correct) strategic assessment that that national security was the 800-lb gorilla of this election - one they couldn't go around but had to try and deal with. The problem, of course, is that given Kerry's record on national security in the United States Senate, the only thing the campaign could use to address the issue was Kerry's service in Vietnam thirty-five years ago. The result is that we now have one candidate running a campaign based on issues and another running a campaign based on a four -month piece of his biography when he was twenty-five years old. This has led to the bizarre, disjointed dialogue we've seen in the past few months which has gone something like this: Bush: "After 9/11 national security is a paramount concern to our republic.We must take the fight to the terrorists where they are and not wait to be forced to fight them at home." Kerry: "I served two tours of duty in Vietnam." Cheney: "Senator Kerry's 20-year voting record shows poor national security judgment." Kerry: "Stop questioning my patriotism." realclearpolitics.com

To: AuBug who wrote (8262)	9/7/2004 12:00:59 PM
From: KLP	Respond to of 27181

Only the people who want to be in poverty today, are. There are MULTIPLE programs for people to help themselves....food stamps, work programs, etc. The only people who really need help are receiving that help. Privately or federally...... Be very specific when you toss those terms around. Who exactly are the poverty stricken or the homeless, and where are they? And exactly why are they either when all the programs have been here since LBJ's Give Away..........in the 1960's....