SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (619484)9/7/2004 5:18:37 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
"We need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime. We all know the litany of his offenses. He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. ...And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but it is not new. It has been with us since the end of the Persian Gulf War."

- John Kerry, January 2003



To: tejek who wrote (619484)9/7/2004 5:27:45 PM
From: PROLIFE  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
Kerry flip flops again...the poor confused old dude cannot even keep his mind made up about anytthing can he???

Actually, he sees that he is a loser and he is grasping and lying his ass off to try and save his campaign.



To: tejek who wrote (619484)9/7/2004 5:30:25 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
The end of the Bush National Guard "scandal":
Message 20494503



To: tejek who wrote (619484)9/7/2004 5:39:00 PM
From: DizzyG  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Kerry vs. Kerry
What does "the wrong war in the wrong place at the wrong time" mean?
by William Kristol
09/07/2004 12:20:00 PM

JOHN KERRY said yesterday that Iraq was "the wrong war in the wrong place at the wrong time." Translation: We would be better off if Saddam Hussein were still in power.

Not an unheard of point of view. Indeed, as President Bush pointed out today, it was Howard Dean's position during the primary season. On December 15, 2003, in a speech at the Pacific Council on International Policy in Los Angeles, Dean said that "the capture of Saddam Hussein has not made America safer." Dean also said, "The difficulties and tragedies we have faced in Iraq show the administration launched the war in the wrong way, at the wrong time, with inadequate planning, insufficient help, and at the extraordinary cost, so far, of $166 billion."

EDIT: This is the best part...

But who challenged Dean immediately? John Kerry. On December 16, at Drake University in Iowa, Kerry asserted that "those who doubted whether Iraq or the world would be better off without Saddam Hussein, and those who believe today that we are not safer with his capture, don't have the judgment to be president or the credibility to be elected president."

Kerry was right then.

weeklystandard.com



To: tejek who wrote (619484)9/7/2004 5:54:17 PM
From: PROLIFE  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Mr. Kerry has said none of his Purple Heart injuries, only one of which removed him from the field for two days, was critical.
After his third Purple Heart, Mr. Kerry requested and was granted permission to return to the United States to work behind a desk in New York. Even while still a Navy man, he began traveling to antiwar rallies ..


washtimes.com