Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Discuss the candidates honestly. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ChinuSFO who wrote (4404)	9/8/2004 2:18:12 PM
From: tonto	Respond to of 4965

Other moderators taking your place secretly? Too funny! It adds to the storyline...(s) To:ChinuSFO who wrote (327) From: unclewest Tuesday, Sep 7, 2004 10:36 PM View Replies (2) \| Respond to of 389 Since SI Dave has now explained the moderated thread rules to you. Message 20497327 And since I was banned from your thread by somebody who did not have that authority. And you agreed to reinstate me if I answered one question. Restate your question, reinstate me and I'll continue the debate. I would appreciate it if you could control your minions and their personal attacks. I refrain from that action in the interest of intellectual discussion. Are you open minded enough to handle all that? Can you debate the issues or is your thread for your good old boys only? uw To:unclewest who wrote (363) From: ChinuSFO Tuesday, Sep 7, 2004 10:47 PM View Replies (4) \| Respond to of 389 I banned you and nobody else. Every ban has my approval. I was gone for a long weekend and when I got back I either approved each ban and those which I did not approve were brought back. There are few whose name I would not want to disclose but I would be happy to PM them to you. Now if you want to do what you say you would namely carry on a intellectual discussion, then surely you are welcome. We have Brmar89 who is a very strong pro-Bush and anti-Kerry (has posted on those lines) and I have not banned him. Same with lorne and there is a list. However in your case, let me see what the question was. I am racing off to a meeting now. But I will pursue this in the next 24 hours for sure. To:ChinuSFO who wrote (364) From: wstera_02 Wednesday, Sep 8, 2004 4:19 AM Respond to of 389 "Every ban has my approval...... Now if you want to do what you say you would namely carry on a intellectual discussion, then surely you are welcome...." Gee, you banned me & I didn't engage in personal attacks or anything that would have violated the standards for discussion on your thread. All I did was respond to a few posts & provide factual information that refuted what another poster said. I was prepared to continue my intellectual discussion until you summarily banned me. So could you explain precisely why I was banned? TIA To:ChinuSFO who wrote (364) From: longnshort Wednesday, Sep 8, 2004 8:07 AM View Replies (1) \| Respond to of 389 You ban me because I called you an ignorant facist braindead bozo. And I stand by my statement. I think I also said it must suck to be you. To:longnshort who wrote (368) From: sandintoes Wednesday, Sep 8, 2004 10:04 AM Respond to of 389 HWL I was banned for a very legitimate reason, I was the only Republican left.