SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (68517)9/9/2004 3:59:23 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793625
 
This may be worth a point or two.



More than that. It is a perfect opening to really go at the media. They have been overplaying their hand, and this was their big "September surprise." I don't think we are being overconfident. There is NO WAY MS Word lines up with a typewriter available in 1972.

The media not only has to "mea culpa," but they can't run one more word about Bush's NG record without looking even more like fools.



To: carranza2 who wrote (68517)9/9/2004 4:05:02 PM
From: Road Walker  Respond to of 793625
 
Message 20504578



To: carranza2 who wrote (68517)9/9/2004 4:16:42 PM
From: KyrosL  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793625
 
You can easily determine that a document was done on a typewriter versus a modern laser printer. All you need is a fairly low power microscope to examine the ink pattern. I find it unbelievable that this simple test was not done.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News