SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (68555)9/9/2004 5:08:19 PM
From: Ilaine  Respond to of 793652
 
The type of thing an expert would look at was posted upstream - the four has a closed top and no "foot," which he says is found ONLY in Times New Roman and that is used ONLY on computers.

If so, it's an obvious forgery. The next question is "cui bono"?



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (68555)9/9/2004 5:40:25 PM
From: Alan Smithee  Respond to of 793652
 
You don't even need that, just a manifying glass. At most. Typewriters have keys that strike the page and leave dents. It's easy to feel and see.

That's fine if you have an original document. The memos in question are copies, and appear to have been copied and recopied several times.

See the post above regarding Philip Bouffard, a document and typeface expert who willing to state that there is a 90% or higher chance the documents are forged.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News