Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Spheres who wrote (68694)	9/9/2004 10:17:55 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 793639

Maybe by the morning there will be some validation, but for now, there are many of us still willing to believe that the memos are credible evidence Spehres, those documents were obviously done in Microsoft Word. Same font, same spacing, same kerning, same superscripts, same everything. Now maybe CBS News has a good explanation of why they put up Word documents and told us they were 1973 memos. I'm still waiting to hear it. They're going to have to plead incompetence, that they were told that transcripts were originals, and didn't bother to look at them. Or maybe they forget to mention that they were transcripts on the web site. There is really no other explanation. You would think the forger could have at least found an old typewriter to write the memos. Update: Powerline found a real Killian memo from 5 September 1973 for comparison, and has a shot of it next to the CBS fake August 18 1973 memo. Go to the bottom of this post and look at the word "to" in each of the memos, and you will see the difference kerning makes: powerlineblog.com