SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Proof that John Kerry is Unfit for Command -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: stockman_scott who wrote (8907)9/10/2004 3:02:51 PM
From: PROLIFE  Respond to of 27181
 
McMahon: ‘A story that had to be told’

09/10/2004


WASHINGTON -- A Democratic mayor from Delaware County was involved in a new documentary that claims presidential hopeful John F. Kerry betrayed Vietnam POWs with lies about war crimes. Media Mayor Bob McMahon said he assisted producer Carlton Sherwood, a retired journalist, with the production of "Stolen Honor: Wounds that Never Heal," a 45-minute film that was unveiled at the Marine Officers Reserve building Thursday.

"This was a story that had to be told," said McMahon, a Vietnam veteran. "I’m very proud of the work that has gone into ‘Stolen Honor’ and I’m happy to help give another side of the view that’s been held as true for more than 30 years."

The film features stories from 17 POWs claiming that Viet Cong interrogators used Kerry’s 1971 testimony before the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee as fodder to demand confessions of such atrocities and as rationale for continued torture of the captured soldiers. Kerry’s testimony recounted tales of abuse and war crimes by American troops in Vietman; some of which was later discredited.

The film was shown to a gathering of 25 POWs, their families, supportive legislators, a throng of media and other invited guests.

Also in the crowd from Delaware County were U.S. Rep. Curt Weldon, R-7, of Thornbury, Springfield Republican Chairman Charles P. Sexton Jr. and former Delaware County Council Chairman Wally Nunn, a Drexel Hill Republican and Vietnam veteran who is the chairman of the Medal of Honor Society.

Nunn was thanked by Sherwood for his "significant contributions" to the project, while McMahon remained out of the limelight during the event. He did not say what those contributions were.

The film was produced on a shoestring budget -- $220,000 -- and was funded entirely by Pennsylvania veterans, said Sherwood, a Central Pennsylvania resident. The veterans were not named.

Produced by Red, White and Blue Productions Inc., an independent film agency based in Harrisburg, the film also includes interviews with two Congressional Medal of Honor recipients -- George E. "Bud" Day, who was imprisoned for more than 5½ years, and Leo K. Thorsness, who was also a POW for a little more than five years.

McMahon said approximately 70 POWs were interviewed for the project but that the number used in the film was trimmed to 17 because of the limited time available to complete the project.

While the stories of the POWs sounded legitimate, the Kerry campaign warned that the group has a shady history.

"This group is the poor, distant cousin of the Swift Boat Veterans for Bush," said Mark Nevins, a spokesman for the campaign. "It’s comprised of people with questionable backgrounds whose sole mission in life is to smear John Kerry."

Nevins pointed out that Sherwood, who also narrates in the film, was arrested for illegally taping a conversation in 1983 and falsely accused the Vietnam veterans of mishandling the $9 million they were granted to build the Vietnam War Memorial in 1984.

Nevins also suggested Sherwood was another right-wing conspirator who hired Republican public relations firm Shirley and Bannister to help market their product.

However Sherwood insisted this project was not politically motivated.

"I’m a political independent and always have been," Sherwood said. "This is not political, it is deeply personal."

Weldon assisted Sherwood in securing a location to showcase the film, and also set up two separate viewings for interested members of Congress.

"I am not questioning John Kerry’s service in the military because I hold in highest regard any American who serves the country, and that includes John Kerry," said Weldon, who did not serve in the military. "But by calling these POWs baby killers, he tarnished their image and contributed to keeping them in prison for as many as eight years."

Sexton was so moved by the film that he challenged former Media mayor and director of the upcoming Media Film Festival Frank Daly to add this documentary to his program.

"He should invite Carlton Sherwood to Media and have him show this film," said Sexton. "And if he doesn’t then he’s biased and a coward."

Daly, a Democrat and former mayor of Media, who is showing two of Michael Moore’s films at his festival, including the controversial "Fahrenheit 9/11," said that despite what some people think, his festival is not politically driven.

"As hard as it is for the Charles Sextons of the world to understand, the film festival has no political affiliation whatsoever," said Daly. "I originally confused the idea of a film festival with the concept of a retrospective, that’s why the Moore films were included. Once I understood what a festival was, more movies were added."

While on the subject of "Stolen Honor," Daly took the opportunity to praise McMahon in his efforts, despite not always agreeing with him on the subject of Vietnam.

"What you have to appreciate about the Democrats in Media is we are all independent thinkers," he said. "There are no Charlie Sextons who tell us all how to think. Bob is a regular Democrat, but unless you’ve been to Vietnam, you can’t understand his convictions. He took part in this project out of genuine motivation and not for political purposes. We may not agree on Vietnam, but I’m not going to criticize him because of it."

McMahon concurred with Daly, and said that veterans’ issues and the business of running Media do not run hand-in-hand.

"My colleagues in Media and I have discussed Vietnam and have disagreed," said McMahon. "But we have always come together on issues that are in the best interest of the borough of Media."


©The Daily Times 2004



To: stockman_scott who wrote (8907)9/10/2004 3:14:16 PM
From: JakeStraw  Respond to of 27181
 
I'm John Kerry's Record and I'm Reporting for Exposure

by Frank Salvato
Friday, September 10, 2004

''I'm John Kerry and I’m reporting for duty.'' Those were the words that opened the dog and pony show that was John Kerry’s acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention. As Kerry has told us ad nausem, he served in Vietnam. What he hasn’t told us could be compiled on a list that would make Santa Claus' ''naughty and nice'' list look like a Post-It Note.

Let's first expose the fact that John Kerry was not the enthusiastic patriot he portrays himself to be. This isn't to say he is unpatriotic even though I believe his patriotism should be examined. His insistence that the United Nations, especially in light of the Oil-for-Food scandal, approve any U.S. military action, suggests that he would acquiesce to the whim of the international community before taking action to secure our nation. This sentiment alone mandates an examination of his patriotism, especially when one considers the ''over the top'' rhetoric he used in false testimony before the Senate in 1971--but I digress.

Kerry applied for a deferment in 1966 so he could study in France for a year. Only when he was denied this deferment did he opt to volunteer for the Navy signing an officer candidate contract to join the Naval Reserves. It was popular among young men of that day to volunteer in an effort to avoid being drafted into the Army.

Kerry’s contract was for six years of active and reserve duty, and one year of inactive standby reserves. The ''three Purple Hearts and out'' clause simply made it possible for Kerry to transfer out of harm's way. It didn’t void the contract he signed with the Navy. He was still obligated to serve out his contract, a contract that would have seen his active duty ending in 1972 and reserve duty ending in 1978.

In Kerry's letter asking for early release from active duty, he falsely stated that his ''regular period of obligated service would be completed in December of this year.'' On January 3, 1970, Lt. Kerry was transferred to the Naval Reserve Manpower Center in Bainridge, Maryland. On July 1, 1972, Lt. Kerry was transferred to Standby Reserve Inactive. On February 16, 1978, Lt. Kerry was discharged from Naval Reserve.

John Kerry was discharged from active duty, not the military, on January 3, 1970 after serving only three years and eighteen days of his contract with the Navy. At this time he was obligated to attend 48 Naval Reserve drills per year and complete 17 days of active training during each of the years required. But because Kerry hasn’t been forthright with the American people, because he hasn’t been transparent to the point of signing a Form 180 to release the total of his military records--not the incomplete and embellished offerings posted on his campaign website--we’ll never know if he satisfied these requirements or not. Of course, the mainstream media could force him to open his files as they have forced President Bush to do, but that would require the media to be non-partisan, something they have consistently proven they're not.

Even though Kerry's contract with the Navy mandated that his service would have been completed in total in 1978 it is troubling to note that he didn’t receive an Honorable Discharge until March 12, 2001. This raises questions as to the category of his discharge at the time he left military service. It also raises questions as to how he came to acquire an Honorable Discharge almost 30 years after the fact. But that isn’t the most troubling aspect of the time directly after his service in Vietnam.

It's interesting to note that no official military records have been released regarding the whereabouts, actions or daily status of John Kerry from January 3, 1970 to July 1, 1972. We know he was active with Vietnam Veterans Against the War during this time and that he even appeared before the Senate, testifying--or perjuring himself--to the atrocities American soldiers were committing, ''on a daily basis and with the full knowledge of their superiors,'' both actions in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. But where the military is concerned, nothing.

As the liberally biased media start to rehash President Bush's National Guard record, let's demand some straight answers from Senator Kerry about his military record beyond the ''honors'' he insists he acquired. Let's find out if he satisfied his military obligation and if his actions and testimony after he left the service constitutes activities illegal. Let's get Senator Kerry to release all of his records so we can truly see who and what he is. It's the least he can do when asking for the trust of the American people.

Next up for exposure: John Kerry’s Senate accomplishments. Oh wait, there aren’t any.



To: stockman_scott who wrote (8907)9/10/2004 5:12:38 PM
From: jficquette  Respond to of 27181
 
Kerry wouldn't make it 4 years. He would be forced to resign.

John