Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (69065)	9/10/2004 9:36:31 PM
From: Gut Trader	Respond to of 793825

"If the TypeSet Don't Fit ....You must Acquit!!!!! GT

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (69065)	9/10/2004 10:05:25 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793825

>>Typewriters did not use Times Roman! IBM Executive DID use Times New Roman. I have only seen one line in it, from an old catalogue scanned on Free Republic, and it does NOT look like the Killian memos, but it needs to be looked into (if it already hasn't been.) 216.77.188.54 IBM Executive DID proportional spacing, and it DID have a "th" key available on at least some models, which did NOT look like the Word "th" superscript, it was a real ligature. Ligatures are connected.