Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (69101)	9/10/2004 11:33:26 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793840

BTW, Rather's witness retracted, said he was misled to believe that the memos were handwritten, only heard the content over the phone, never saw them. Hodges says he said, "well, if he wrote them, that's how he felt." Oh, sweet. Hodges was their "extra mile", wasn't he? So, CBS has the memos, one retracting witness, and one handwriting expert (for hire), who examined photocopies. They also talked to the widow and son, but didn't use them because their stories didn't support the anti-Bush charges. They also did not interview other potential witnesses, since they were likely to be pro-Bush. Is this, ahem, the total of their "evidence" for this story? It does look like ABC News is on the story. Schadenfreude trumps all.