Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (201436)	9/11/2004 12:01:38 AM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574054

"is a detailed analysis by one of the top type analysts in the country. " Problem 1 with Dr. Bouffard's analysis is that Times Roman dates back to 1931. Problem 2, the type face on the documents in question is a close match to Bold Face 2 used on the IBM Executive. Which, oddly enough, does proportional spacing. Problem 3, IBM very commonly used fonts that made the character '4' without a foot and closed at the top. Problem 4, look at the memos. You can see slight variations in the alignment of the characters, some are slightly higher than others. This, while not impossible, is very difficult to do with a word processor. It, however, is common on a typewriter that hasn't been adjusted recently. I won't go into the unlikelihood of someone developing a program named "C:\TYPE"...

To: TimF who wrote (201436)	9/11/2004 12:03:38 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574054

Tim Thanks for this post. It pretty much closes the door to the notion these documents may be real. Unless you believe OJ is innocent.