Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (201441)	9/11/2004 12:07:06 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574071

You're working overtime on this. You just can't accept that you MIGHT be wrong about this, and that the liberal media MIGHT have cooked something up. Certainly, the articles Tim posted are far more conclusive than anything you, me, or anyone else on this thread can come up with. Bottom line: Fake. Fake. Fake.

To: combjelly who wrote (201441)	9/11/2004 12:45:57 AM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574071

Problem 1 with Dr. Bouffard's analysis is that Times Roman dates back to 1931. "UPDATE: Also, for all of the people bugging me about the fact that Times Roman has been around since the thirties - yes, yes, in printing presses, not as a proportional typewriter font. You guys can come up with theories and comment or e-mail them to me all day long, but experts that do this for a living will be likely be able to tell you why you are wrong. That's why they are called "experts."" indcjournal.com A lot more at Message 20511828