SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (69370)9/11/2004 7:47:57 PM
From: Sig  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793955
 
Lets give all the veterans of the 1970' a view of all 4 pages to compare with the typing on their discharge papers or other papers they have around.
Sig(USAF 1946)



To: The Philosopher who wrote (69370)9/11/2004 8:00:37 PM
From: jficquette  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793955
 
If he was a lawyer the equivalent act would be to enter forged documents to either convict someone or defend someone. That is criminal and that lawyer would be disbarred.

You can argue if he is guilty all you want but I know that he is.

John



To: The Philosopher who wrote (69370)9/11/2004 8:15:16 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793955
 
Rather, either personally or through his agent, lied to a witness (Hodges) in order to elicit false testimony.

I don't think the fact that neither were sworn under oath would matter, at least not where I practice law.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News