Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: denizen48 who wrote (201535)	9/11/2004 11:06:38 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574258

yeah, dan rather said so on tv, it must be true! Bush may suck to you guys on the left, but john "jane fonda" kerry will be lucky to win Massachusetts....

To: denizen48 who wrote (201535)	9/11/2004 11:17:05 PM
From: i-node	Respond to of 1574258

>> This is what you consider a slam-dunk? It is your term, not mine. I can say the probability these documents were produced on a Selectric is near-nil. >> For as many times as the military uses th-superscripted, I wouldn't be surprised that they would have even had it incorporated in their Selectrics. No. They didn't have it "incorporated" into their Selectrics. Nobody has been able to produce a type ball that could have produced this character pair. When someone does, fine. Until then, with most experts agreeing it didn't exist, or at the very least, would have been an exceptionally rare animal, there is simply no case to be made. All of your general data-base arguments about proportional & Roman have been proven false. None of my arguments have proven false. Not one. Please provide whatever proof you think you have if you want to level an accusation like this. All that's left is the space in front of the superscript argument in regards to WORD. Why do you think WORD does it? Because it looks better!!!! Nitwit. Looks have nothing to do with it. The space was placed there intentionally by the typist to inhibit Word's Autocorrect feature's automatic substitution of the kerned "th" pair. You guys are so clueless you can't even discuss the subject competently.

To: denizen48 who wrote (201535)	9/12/2004 5:15:11 AM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1574258

This is what you consider a slam-dunk? For as many times as the military uses th-superscripted, I wouldn't be surprised that they would have even had it incorporated in their Selectrics. No, if you want to prove forgery, you can't argue your point by making a forgery of your own. All of your general data-base arguments about proportional & Roman have been proven false. All that's left is the space in front of the superscript argument in regards to WORD. Why do you think WORD does it? Because it looks better!!!! Now what makes you think that IBM didn't think about looks back then???????? Whatever, you're not really concerned about the truth, just about getting that miserable failure re-elected. Welcome to the thread! ted