Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (69590)	9/12/2004 3:30:18 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793884

Nano"-Nuanced? Bribed, or Coerced? That's Richard Holbrooke's definition on the differences between John Kerry's position early on that it was right to disarm and remove Saddam Hussein, and his current position that it's the wrong war in the wrong place at the wrong. With a straight face, Holbrooke maintained that Kerry has been consistant, and it's Bush that has changed and shifted his positions on Iraq. Killer question of the interview was when Chris Wallace reminded Holbrooke of Kerry's comments about the "Coalition of the Bribed and Coerced". Wallace followed this up with the questions "So, Mr. Ambassador, Great Britain and Tony Blair; are they a member of the bribed, or of the coerced?" He then repeated that question with Italy and Poland. Ouch. Yeah, Senator, is Britain one of the Coerced, or the Bribed? How about Australia? Coerced, or Bribed? silentrunning.tv