SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (201676)9/12/2004 5:54:23 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573959
 
"Not sure a typewriter repairmen qualifies as a forgery expert."

No, but he likely knows what kind of typewriters were out there. You know, the whole question about whether or not the memos could be done in the 1970's? If all the arguments about how it wasn't technically possible to do those memos in the early 1970's are wrong, how reliable are the other factors that are analyzed?

I think you over-estimate the ones who have bought into the blogs...



To: i-node who wrote (201676)9/12/2004 11:58:09 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1573959
 
Not sure a typewriter repairmen qualifies as a forgery expert.

But a CPA from Hot Springs, ARK. does. I don't think so.



To: i-node who wrote (201676)9/13/2004 1:30:31 AM
From: denizen48  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573959
 
OK, a guy who repaired IBM SELECTRICS for years doesn't qualify as an expert.
You tell me why anybody with an ounce of common sense would disqualify the repairman, but take the word of an expert in computer-generated forgeries? Your guy knows a lot less about typewriters than our guy, a lot less.
Your logic works for SWIFTIES only. Like I said, you'll defend Bush no matter what the actual reality is or was.