Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (55536)	9/12/2004 9:01:05 PM
From: unclewest	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 89467

there are some headscratchers about equipment, but the set of actions are consistent, that is to say there is no need to assume the author changed motives or techniques in the middle. If you print out the four documents from the CBS site, the six documents from the USA Today site and the 3 Sep 73 document from GWB's file, and compare them. You will change your mind about that. The author definitely changed techniques. He got sloppy...that is one of the key reasons he got caught. Compare them...you will likely laugh at how dumb the changes are. Be sure to look compare the address block on the 24 June 1973 memo with the others and look at the signature on the 01 February 1972 document. You will then understand why CBS did not release those to the public. I am sure it was a 110% mistake to give them to USA Today. CBS really screwed the pooch with that. USA Today did the same to CBS when they put them on their website. The 3 Sep 73 document is important because it was endorsed by KILLIAN on 6 Sep using a typewriter (likely the unit typewriter, since it is an official document). It is a stark comparison to the CBS documents. It also provides a basis for signature comparison. Hint. They don't match. The signature on the 01 February document looks like it slipped under the copier... really it does. LOL. And it is likely the wrong signature as it is not even close to Killian's. TP, I don't believe you could have looked at the documents and compared them with your own eyes and would make that statement. No need to believe me. Look for yourself. You will find direct links to the CBS and USA Today documents here. usatoday.com And in the left sidebar at this link. cbsnews.com Best Regards, uw

To: TigerPaw who wrote (55536)	9/12/2004 10:02:54 PM
From: upanddown	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 89467

If we are to believe that these are forgeries, then the forger supposedly made mistakes, like using a computer That to me is one of the most telling reasons why this is not a forgery. A big-time, complicated forgery like this would have to involve the complicity and cooperation of numerous people in this vast left-wing conspiracy. No one involved would say "uh lets get a early 70s typewriter to do this. A word processor would be a dead giveaway."??????? I would like to ask those who insist that this is a forgery. If you were involved, would you use a word processor? It just seems so obvious.....NO. That would be dumb and amateurish.