Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (55550)	9/12/2004 10:01:19 PM
From: unclewest	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

The CBS expert made a convincing statement that the signatures were genuine. CBS already admitted the expert only saw one of the six documents. What could he compare?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (55550)	9/13/2004 4:08:07 AM
From: KLP	Respond to of 89467

The signatures might have been copied from something else, and then cut and pasted onto the newly created documents....then these newly created documents were copied MANY times .......making them to look like 'older copies of an original document.' As Bill Clinton taught us all...."is is, is?" In this case....which original document....? the one they are trying to pass off to CBS as real.... In the 1972 era....onion skins were used for copies....very seldom copy machines were used....big, bulky, and expensive to use... BTW...onion skin copies were never signed. They were used for file copies. The CBS expert made a convincing statement that the signatures were genuine.