SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: upanddown who wrote (55601)9/13/2004 1:46:27 AM
From: unclewest  Respond to of 89467
 
OK so Col. Jerry Killian must have had many other pilots under his command in Bush's unit and must have created many paper reviews of them on similar or identical forms.

Has any comparison been done to them?


John,
Since LTC Killian died 20 years ago, I doubt we get access. But a Pentagon investigator can.

There is one document available...it is the 5 sep 73 application for disharge by GWB. The endorsement on that document dated the next day, has Killian's real signature and it was typed on a regular military typewriter.
I understand why GWB's part is done that way...but don't know why the LTC would use an old typewriter for that endorsement when every other available document from him, done then, is typed on what appears to me to be a PC using MS Word.

And I disagree with TP. I do see remarkable differences in the signatures...but am quite willing to leave that judgement to experts.
uw



To: upanddown who wrote (55601)9/13/2004 2:05:47 AM
From: unclewest  Respond to of 89467
 
John,
Do you have an opinion on the 18 August 1973 CBS document?

In it, Staudt is mentioned as pressuring the command about Bush and day to day stuff.

But there could be no influence...General Staudt retired from USAF 18 months before that memo was dated.
That memo is pure BS imo.
uw