SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (69848)9/13/2004 1:03:11 PM
From: SBHX  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793884
 
What's your source of the scanned copies? I was looking at the foxnews and abcnews versions. Are there cleaner versions?

I think both pdf versions were grainy and looked like they were not 1st or even 3rd gen xerox copies. (unless the xerox machine had really bad ink).

Most of the type looks faded, however, the horizontal and vertical spacing and outline of the characters are dead ringers for Microsoft Word wysiwyg display.

If someone were to type the entire thing in microsoft word, print them out on transparencies and do an overlay over a really good original, that would be more compelling.

However, I still really don't understand how hard it is for cbsnews to just run over to a pc somewhere with word from office 2000 in there and just type the text in one by one.



To: Lane3 who wrote (69848)9/13/2004 2:54:23 PM
From: Neeka  Respond to of 793884
 
More indications of sloppy put up job.

Three (I'm, Bush's and I'll) of the four apostrophes in the document are curved, the fourth (wasn't) is not.