SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mary Cluney who wrote (70109)9/14/2004 11:40:30 AM
From: Oral Roberts  Respond to of 794181
 
Anybody can copy a signature since it seems there are no originals for an expert to look at. How convenient.



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (70109)9/14/2004 12:01:34 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794181
 
That should not be hard to prove - whether it is a valid signature or not

If CBS had the originals, then they could validate the signature, and whether the document had been written on a typewriter. But it turns out that CBS doesn't have the originals, only copies of copies.

No credible expert should have said that he validated a document from a photocopy. Too easy to forge. But you can invalidate a document from a copy, and these documents have been invalidated. They're phony as a three dollar bill; they were written in Microsoft Word.



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (70109)9/14/2004 1:10:19 PM
From: unclewest  Respond to of 794181
 
I understand there are four documents. Do they have a signature on them?

That should not be hard to prove - whether it is a valid signature or not.


There are four CBS documents in this issue.

This issue becomes quite clear when you print out the four CBS documents, the six USA Today documents (Four of which match the CBS four.) and any document with Jerry B Killian's signature, known to have been signed by Jerry B Killian.

I have all 4 from CBS, the six from USA Today and a known Killian document spread across my desk as I type this.

Comments on each:

02 February 1962. Signed but not even close to a match to Killain's known signature. Perhaps more important, the signature is several inches below the signature block, indicating to me that overlapping documents probably slipped in the copy machine.

**04 May 1972. Signed. Does not match Killian's known signature imo.

**19 May 1972. Unsigned

24 June 1973. Signed. Obvious forgery imo.

**01 August 1972. No signature. Initials only. Not a match.

**18 August 73. Unsigned.

The above are all six documents released by USA Today.

CBS only released the four identified by **.

Notice that CBS held back the two most obvious forged signatures.

Notice that only one of the CBS documents is signed with a signature


For signature comparison, I used the 5 Sep 73 Application for discharge signed by GWB and endorsed and signed by LTC Killian the following day using his full signature.
unclewest