Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Raptor's Den II -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CharlieChina who wrote (2377)	9/14/2004 11:56:05 AM
From: Tom Swift	Respond to of 3432

Court Denies 'Sex Bail' for Prisoner 29 minutes ago Add Oddly Enough - Reuters to My Yahoo! AHMEDABAD, India (Reuters) - An Indian court has refused to release a Muslim, charged over the train torching that triggered Gujarat's Hindu-Muslim rioting two years ago, so he could go home to have sex with his wife. The special court in Gujarat's main city, Ahmedabad (news - web sites), said if it granted bail in this case, many other prisoners would ask for the same thing, officials said on Tuesday. Firozkhan Zafarkhan sought bail last month, saying he and his wife suffered mental trauma because they had not had sex for a long time. He has been in jail more than 30 months, charged under a tough anti-terrorism law with being part of a mob that torched a train in Godhra, in western Gujarat state, in February, 2002, burning alive 59 Hindu pilgrims, including women and children. That attack triggered days of communal bloodshed, some of India's worst, in which rights groups say more than 2,000 people, mostly Muslims, were burned and hacked to death. Zafarkhan had told the court his religion and India's conservative culture forbade him from having sex with anyone but his wife. "We opposed the bail plea because granting of bail to one would have opened the floodgates of such requests from other prisoners. There is also no provision in law," prosecutor Sudhir Brahmbhatt said. But the judge did order longer visiting hours.

To: CharlieChina who wrote (2377)	9/14/2004 2:25:31 PM
From: Joe Smith	Respond to of 3432

I notice that you still have not fixed that red zone from 8/5-8/16. How can you maintain that lie? That was a bad call zone for you. How can you represent it as anything else? You were briefly cash on 8/10 and briefly short on 8/11. The rest of the time you were green. BTW, the cash and short calls line up pretty well with a bounce. Respond to this or I will keeep hounding you. Here are your posts: Member 3768600

To: CharlieChina who wrote (2377)	9/15/2004 8:37:34 AM
From: Tom Swift	Respond to of 3432

Man Shows Up Drunk for His Hearing 1 hour, 6 minutes ago Add Strange News - AP to My Yahoo! READING, Pa. - A motorist's bail was revoked when police said he had the daring to show up drunk to his preliminary hearing on drunken driving charges. Emerson Moore Jr., 46, of Caernarvon Township, was awaiting his hearing before Muhlenberg Township District Justice Dean R. Patton when Moore got into an argument with state police Trooper Roberto Soto, officials said. Soto, who had arrested Moore in the drunken-driving case June 20, smelled alcohol on Moore's breath as the two stood in the hallway outside Patton's courtroom, officials said. Moore, who had driven himself to court, had a blood-alcohol level of 0.10 percent, police said. The legal limit for driving in Pennsylvania is 0.08 percent. Patton revoked Moore's bail and sent him to Berks County Prison on $2,500 bail. He also will be cited for public drunkenness, he said. "You don't show up drunk for a preliminary hearing, especially when it's a drunk-driving case," Patton said. "I asked him what he was thinking and he said, 'You told me I could drink at home.'"