Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RetiredNow who wrote (202056)	9/14/2004 5:26:39 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572673

Hmm vote for Kerry? What would the rest of the Texans say? What would happen to the environment if Bush wasn't here to promote oil companies? news.bbc.co.uk

To: RetiredNow who wrote (202056)	9/14/2004 6:09:55 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Respond to of 1572673

MM, Well, then you should vote for Kerry. He has a plan for a pullout on a set timetable. Kerry also wants to get active on the diplomatic front, which Bush has failed to do. The only problem with Kerry is that voting for him will be a return to the status quo, given how little backbone Kerry has for making tough decisions. Many people are so damn sure that what Bush is doing is wrong, but don't have a clue as to what Kerry would do instead, much less an idea of how things could indeed be worse. Meanwhile the press is going ga-ga over forged memos and unauthorized biographies because the question of Iraq is no longer newsworthy (except when it comes to showing more footage of corpses littering the streets). The reason is that most people have already made up their minds and are just waiting for early November to see who wins and who whines. Tenchusatsu