SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Eric L who wrote (42282)9/15/2004 8:40:46 PM
From: Clarksterh  Respond to of 197200
 
Some Qualcomm patents still apply because you are using CDMA technology in the first layer. If you pick up a few tricks from GSM's Layer 1 and put it into CDMA's Layer 1m, then you get TD-SCDMA that allows you to bypass Qualcomm patents.

I'd like to see them do the fast power control as needed for CDMA without Qualcomm patents. Other patents are equally problematic. As for the words, of course they are going to assert that, just as Ericsson asserted (incorrectly) that WCDMA didn't need Q IP. No surprise.

Clark



To: Eric L who wrote (42282)9/15/2004 11:43:39 PM
From: Maurice Winn  Respond to of 197200
 
<UMTS (3G) is not as patent-friendly as GSM is. >

Blah blah blah.... 16% for GSM 5% for CDMA.

What does "patent-friendly" mean in Hindi? I suppose the GSM patents earn more than CDMA patents for the intellectual property owners, so, they are more "friendly" to the patent holders.

Mq



To: Eric L who wrote (42282)9/16/2004 4:12:19 AM
From: masa  Respond to of 197200
 
Well, let's put it this way: I know that my opinions are not rated very high here. But to me it seems that TD-SCDMA has some weaknesses, and may not be a real winner, not even in China (and let's put it this way, quite many real players in the field are "kind of playing, but not really seriously" in that field).