Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gamesmistress who wrote (70866)	9/16/2004 10:12:45 AM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794001

The Kerry campaign has a lot of talented people, including Bob Shrum. But the difference that pops out at you when you look at both campaigns is that the Bush campaign has a final authority, and that’s Karl Rove. Now, there are other important advisers around Bush—political advisers; Mark McKinnon, who handles the media; Karen Hughes, who travels with Bush; Matthew Dowd, who is called chief strategist. Karl Rove is the boss, and he has a meeting every weekend at his home with these people. He signs off on everything. But in the Kerry campaign it’s much more of a committee. this is highly predicative of how a kerry administration would be run... by committee, without strong leadership... and is why i believe he will not be elected