SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe NYC who wrote (202416)9/16/2004 11:48:51 AM
From: Joe NYC  Respond to of 1573851
 
Kerry's left turn scares Democrats

BY ROBERT NOVAK SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST

To the astonishment and dismay of Democratic politicians, John Kerry over the last weekend appeared to have forgotten his opponent for president. He did not seem to realize that he was running against George W. Bush, not Howard Dean. That was an understandable conclusion to be drawn from the Democratic nominee's course over four days.

Last Friday, Sen. Kerry abruptly returned to the safely buried gun control issue by decrying President Bush for permitting the assault weapons ban to end. On Saturday, he addressed the Congressional Black Caucus with a liberal harangue. On Sunday, Kerry rested. On Monday, Kerry was back boosting gun control, scolding Bush for letting the assault weapons ban expire at midnight.

Only two explanations are possible, and neither is reassuring to worried Democrats. Kerry could be making a conscious, though counterproductive, decision to reassure his liberal base. Or, he could be trapped by the calendar of events -- talking gun control because a deadline had been reached and talking civil rights because the Black Caucus invited him. Democratic strategists are particularly concerned by the latter explanation, suggesting a mindless campaign.

The anxiety created by Kerry's return to gun control is concealed by the facade of serenity among Democrats. Their actual concern was exposed by Democratic activist Paul Begala, who has been assailed for advising the Kerry campaign while appearing as my co-host on CNN's ''Crossfire.'' He said on Monday's program: ''Anyone who's worried that I'm secretly running the Kerry campaign can rest easy. ... As an avid hunter and gun owner myself, I think Kerry's move is a political mistake, because Republicans are now going to try to scare hunters.''

Kerry's emphasis on gun control contradicted not only Begala but also Begala's former boss, Bill Clinton. In his memoir, President Clinton names gun control as a principal cause of the 1994 Democratic election debacle. He asserts that ''the Brady Bill [for screening of gun purchasers] and the assault weapons ban inflamed the Republican base voters and increased their turnout.''

A consensus of Democratic leaders believes that in 2000, gun control delivered West Virginia -- and with it, the presidency -- to George W. Bush. That view is not limited to Clintonite self-styled centrists but extends to champions of the Democratic left. Last December, when former Vermont Gov. Dean was riding high for the presidential nomination, he declared: ''I am tired of coming to the South and fighting elections on guns, God and gays.''

Kerry advisers have recognized what Clinton and Dean were saying. That's why the aloof New England aristocrat emerged this year as a gun-toting outdoorsman. Anybody dedicated to keeping guns from their fellow Americans is not going to vote for Bush. Some officials of the National Rifle Association have told me that their membership is not entirely happy with the Bush administration, raising the prospect of defections to Kerry.

Beyond the gun issue, nobody thinks Kerry's problem is lack of support from the left. Yet, his Black Caucus speech touched all the liberal bases and then played the race card. He quoted W.E.B. DuBois, the black leader who ended his career by joining the Communist Party and going into exile, calling African Americans ''a nation within a nation.'' Reinforcing DuBois, Kerry pledged ''to end the division between the fortunate America and the forgotten America.''

One well-placed Democratic partisan telephoned Kerry campaign headquarters to ask why in the world the campaign was moving left at this critical point. He was told that they were not taking such an illogical step and that he should wait and see as the campaign unfolds.

That appraisal seems honest, but it is not reassuring to sophisticated Democrats. If John Kerry's course last weekend was determined by events that happened to be on the calendar, he has no victory plan. George W. Bush's potential weakness seems to be starting a conflict in Iraq that has cost the lives of over 1,000 U.S. troops and shows no sign of abating. It is not easy for a Democrat to exploit that issue, but raising the peril of terrorists buying assault weapons at gun shows in rural America is not a good start.
suntimes.com

Joe



To: Joe NYC who wrote (202416)9/16/2004 2:39:37 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1573851
 
<font color=brown>Hmmmmmmmm...........there was a lot of "yak-yak" about your president when he was in the NG.......getting special favors because he was a congressman's son. Nothing has changed has it............he was an idiot with no character even back then. LOL.<font color=black>

*********************************************

CBS revisits Bush's Guard memos

Knox told Rather that Killian was "upset" that Bush did not obey his order to have a physical, and she said the young lieutenant showed disregard for the rules to a degree that irritated other pilots.

Knox said the information about Bush in the memos was familiar and that she had typed documents for Killian with similar complaints. She also said the colonel did keep private "cover your back" files.

Continued............

cnn.com



To: Joe NYC who wrote (202416)9/16/2004 3:36:19 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1573851
 
Sep. 15, 2004. 01:00 AM





Widows back Kerry after Bush rebuffs 9/11 probe
President stalled inquiry, they say `Jersey Girls'
condemn Iraq war


TIM HARPER
WASHINGTON BUREAU

WASHINGTON—Five women whose husbands died in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Centre threw their support behind John Kerry yesterday, saying the Democratic presidential challenger would keep America safer by refocusing U.S. efforts to defeat Al Qaeda.

The quintet, who were joined by a survivor of the attack on the Pentagon, said they had been rebuffed by President George W. Bush in every attempt to have a proper investigation into their husbands' deaths and said it sullied the memory of their loved ones to have the war in Iraq linked to the attacks.


"After watching the Republican convention in New York, I'm scared," said Kristen Breitweiser of Middletown, N.J., whose husband Ron perished more than three years ago.

"I'm scared that my daughter, who is five years old, is being handed a tomorrow that will be a war for a lifetime.

"My husband was killed on 9/11. I do not want to lose my daughter 18 years from now when she is living or working in a big city and it is payback for our actions in Iraq.

"I'm scared about what could happen over the next four years."

Security and remembrances of Sept. 11 were central to the Republican convention, held a mere six kilometres from New York's Ground Zero, and homeland security has become the cornerstone of Bush's re-election bid.

Former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, New York Governor George Pataki and a litany of other speakers told Republican delegates that Americans could remain safe under a second Bush term while Kerry would offer a "mushy" response to terrorists that would make the country more vulnerable.

But the women who came forward yesterday said they had to fight to convince the Bush administration to agree to the 9/11 Commission, then fought to convince him to properly finance it, then fought him to give it enough time to do his work.

They say the war in Iraq has become a recruitment tool for terrorists bent on striking the U.S. again and has allowed Osama bin Laden and his followers to regroup.

"We spent 14 months begging for a commission to be established and we found it was President Bush who thwarted our efforts at every turn," said Patty Casazza of Colts Neck, N.J.

Lorie Van Auken of East Brunswick, N.J., said the Bush administration "took its eye off the ball" by invading Iraq before its work was done in Afghanistan and Al Qaeda training camps were still operating.

"He (Bush) did not have the moral high ground to go into Iraq," she said.

Four of the women, Breitweiser, Casazza, Van Auken and Mindy Kleinberg of East Brunswick, N.J., have become known as the "Jersey Girls," widows whose fight for justice in memory of their husbands has politicized them.

They were joined by April Gallop of Woodbridge, Va., who survived the Pentagon attack and Monica Gabrielle of West Haven, Conn., who also lost her husband in the attack.

The Kerry endorsement, and pledge to work on the Democrat's campaign, was the most overt step onto the political stage for the Jersey Girls.

At least two of the six revealed yesterday they had voted for Bush in 2000 but they say this is not a partisan issue.

"If Bush was a Democrat, I would vote for the other party," Gabrielle said.

Kerry welcomed the endorsement and saluted them for their fight to establish the 9/11 Commission.

"Their endorsement sends a clear signal that much more needs to be done to make America safe and to fight a more effective war on terror," Kerry said in a statement. "As president, I will honour their support by making America safer, stronger and more secure."

The Bush campaign did not immediately return a call seeking comment. But one of three other women who lost loved ones on Sept. 11, and who appeared at the Republican convention, told Associated Press she would be willing to campaign for Bush. "Even here in New York, the majority of the families feel that Bush is much stronger on national security," Debra Burlingame, whose brother piloted the flight that crashed into the Pentagon, told Associated Press.

At the convention, Burlingame, Tara Stackpole and Deena Burnett — who both lost husbands — spoke to delegates on a darkstage illuminated by the date of the attack.
Additional articles by Tim Harper

thestar.com



To: Joe NYC who wrote (202416)9/16/2004 9:43:01 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1573851
 
Irate Judge Orders US Gov't to Hand Over Detainee Records

by Jim Lobe

WASHINGTON - In a victory for human and civil rights groups, a federal judge has given the government 30 days to turn over or identify all documents relating to the treatment of detainees held by the United States at military bases and other detention facilities overseas, including at the naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq.

The ruling by Judge Alvin Hellerstein, which may be appealed by the government, was the latest development in a lawsuit filed in June by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and several other rights groups to compel the government to disclose records bearing on the possible abuse of detainees in U.S. military custody pursuant to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests first submitted 11 months ago.

Declaring that ”no one is above the law”, Hellerstein said, ”merely raising national security concerns cannot justify unlimited delays” in complying with the requests. The government had requested that the judge delay the release of all documents until 2005.

”Ours is a government of laws, laws duly promulgated and laws duly observed,” he said in the order issued by his office in New York City Wednesday. ”No one is above the law: not the executive, not the Congress, not the judiciary.”

Continued............

commondreams.org