Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (202424)	9/16/2004 2:10:55 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573868

TP, I just didn't buy the forgery-scenario story as promoted. I can see why. The stakes for CBS and the Kerry campaign are much greater than that of the Bush campaign. Hence the defenders of CBS place the bigger burden of proof on those pushing the forgery theory. So what do you think about CBS' new "fake but accurate" angle? Seems like that would be a tacit confirmation that the memos are indeed forgeries, don't you think? Tenchusatsu

To: TigerPaw who wrote (202424)	9/16/2004 2:29:38 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573868

TigerPaw, I explored several possiblilities, including that the memos were dictated over the phone to a confederate who wrote them down... ...I also backed up my explanations with a variety of links which could be verified and debated instead of pointing to the same propaganda site over and over again. ??? Explored possibilities of how a falsehood can avoid being detected/discovered/proven to be a falsehood? Isn't search for truth more satisfying? It is to me. Suppose you succeeded in coming up with a scenario of falsehood winning (think OJ Simpson). Would you be satisfied? Joe