Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (202461)	9/16/2004 4:09:39 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574096

John, have yet to hear any of you guys comment on the content. Content of a forged document? Besides the fact they are forged, the other relevant things are by whom, for what reason, were laws broken? We can revisit Bush's NG service if you want a diversion, look at his resume, but (and this may surprise a lot of clueless Dems) it is irrelevant. Kerry needs to show resume. Bush already has a record, which is the main thing he is judged on. Should we behead Dan Rather for reporting the truth? LOL. Joe

To: Road Walker who wrote (202461)	9/16/2004 4:23:07 PM
From: Yousef	Respond to of 1574096

John, Re: "Should we behead Dan Rather for reporting the truth?" No we shouldn't behead Dan "Documents are Fake but Accurate" Rather. I think it's going to be much more fun to watch him "twist", "squirm" and then "retract". <ggg> Make It So, Yousef

To: Road Walker who wrote (202461)	9/16/2004 6:41:31 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574096

It takes liberal logic to come to the conclusion that Rather is telling the truth by whipping out some forged documents...