Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (202502)	9/16/2004 6:35:29 PM
From: Road Walker	Respond to of 1574115

re: And OJ Simpson jury believed there was not enough evidence to convict him. Some people believe that there was not enough evidence to convict him. And there were some way out there who believed that OJ was actually innocent. Are you in this group, that believes that the documents are genuine? If you support the docs you support OJ! Careful CJ, I think the Reps are laying a trap for you! <sarcasm off> John

To: Joe NYC who wrote (202502)	9/16/2004 6:55:19 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574115

"And OJ Simpson jury believed there was not enough evidence to convict him." Sure. And over 60% of Americans believe that most of the hijackers on 9/11 were Iraqi. All I am saying is that the documents could have been produced with the technology of the 1970's. I have stated that I don't think someone in Killian's position would have generated the CYA memo unless he was really pissed. And even then, I doubt it. And apparently some of the terminology isn't what the ANG would use. So yeah, on that basis there is reason for doubt. But all of the "experts" that claimed it clearly was done in Word are wrong. Period.