Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (202524)	9/16/2004 7:46:17 PM
From: steve harris	Respond to of 1574557

Also how many times was the original forgery copied to get it "dirty"....

To: i-node who wrote (202524)	9/16/2004 8:10:40 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574557

"I've reviewed the documents and they contain nothing like you've mentioned" Look at this memo. Note the '1' on the 18 of the date. Or the 'u' and the 'h' in "Bush" where it says "Bush wasn't here" cbsnews.com It's in all the documents. For it to be resolution or some type of aliasing problem of the fax machines, the characters would have to unusually thick. Even then, for example the 'a' in the "Harris" on the line "Harris agrees", you can see the little tail on the 'a' but it ends above the serif on the following 'r' and the top of the 'a' extends above the top of the 'r'. Clearly you need to believe these memos were word processed. But the evidence doesn't bear that out.