SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rock_nj who wrote (8269)9/17/2004 10:00:56 AM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 20039
 
Rather Beats his Wife

Unimpeachable sources tell me that Dan Rather smacks his wife around on a regular basis. I have memos proving this, written by Dan Rather to Dan Rather. I can send you copies via e-mail.

Some partisan political operatives are saying the memos are fake. They're wrong, of course, because they're working off second-generation copies in their pajamas. Even though I only have photocopies, and my experts tell me they're fake, I'm convinced the memories are accurate and am standing by my story. The memos are coroborated by multiple sources, whose names I cannot reveal. If any definitive evidence emerges that the memos are false, rest assured I will investigate. Until then the preponderance of evidence indicates that this story is true.

Meanwhile, I note that no one has questioned the substance of this story. Dan Rather needs to answer the following question: Does he smack his wife around on a regular basis?



To: Rock_nj who wrote (8269)9/17/2004 11:29:26 AM
From: sea_urchin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20039
 
Rock_nj, it seems like the real truth is now coming out.

In fact, I'd say the coffee is going to hit the fan very soon.

Here's the original from Alex Jones' site. We mustn't forget some of us have serious objections to material gleaned from rense.com!

prisonplanet.com



To: Rock_nj who wrote (8269)9/17/2004 1:39:18 PM
From: Don Earl  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20039
 
RE: Hilton interview

The thing I find most interesting about Jones is he absolutely WILL NOT discuss the Zionist connections to 9/11. He slips in an innuendo about the Saudi royal family, PNAC is even mentioned, Wolfowitz is mentioned repeatedly, but not a word about Mossad footprints all over 9/11, or the majority of hard core Zionists, including Wolfowitz, which make up PNAC. To the best of my knowledge, there isn't a single piece of evidence in the public domain that would even circumstantially connect Saudi Arabia to 9/11, so why does Jones keep planting the false flags?