Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Proof that John Kerry is Unfit for Command -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gersh Avery who wrote (10574)	9/18/2004 12:07:44 AM
From: Wayners	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27181

Since the 2nd Amendment which is structured like most State Constitutions only mentions the militia or military purpose of firearms, I have to conclude that all this hunting nonsense, means that people are legitimate hunting targets if they are tyrrants. The sporting purpose does not come from an upright source and definitely does not come from a source liberals like to quote. The sporting purpose test comes from the 1938 Nazi firearms legislation that in addition to the sporting purpose test, required that all Jews close their gun dealerships and turn in all their weapons. Boy I wonder why.

To: Gersh Avery who wrote (10574)	9/18/2004 3:16:27 PM
From: Ann Corrigan	Respond to of 27181

Gersh, yes citizens should have the right to bear arms...not super powerful weapons. Only loonies want that type of weapon. A hunter who uses an assault weapon to shoot an animal is not showing any skill whatsoever...just demonstrating problems with his self esteem. The animals have most of the cards stacked against them to begin with and then the great white hunter comes along with an assault weapon...that's ridiculous. What about law enforcement's pleas to renew the ban? Don't those putting their lives on the line have any say in the matter?