Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (71480)	9/18/2004 10:22:24 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793938

Have we got a great "who done it" going, or what? Another Burkett-Kerry Connection? By Captain Ed on Media Watch As Dan Rather might put it, a strong preponderance of evidence points to Bill Burkett as the culprit behind the forgeries that CBS used to smear George Bush. His lawyer, David Van Os, turns out to be a powerful man in the Texas Democratic Party, as Power Line shows us this morning. Here's a partial list of Van Os' accomplishments from his resume: * Travis County Democratic Precinct Chairman * Travis County Democratic Party Chairman * Bexar County Democratic Precinct Chairman Another interesting item on Van Os' CV is the final entry, where he notes his assistance in Palm Beach County, Florida, in Democratic efforts for the recounts in the 2000 Presidential election. No doubt that Van Os is well-known for his 30-year party-building work, and as he has now run for the Texas Supreme Court twice (including his current campaign), he has built a strong level of support within Democratic Party leadership. So how does such a well-connected man within Democratic circles wind up as Burkett's mouthpiece? I can understand why Burkett would want Van Os as his attorney, but why would Van Os want a fringe fire-breather like Burkett as a client, especially this close to his own election? Having any connection to Burkett will likely be fatal to Van Os' hopes for November in Texas. Could it be to give Burkett a connection to the Democrats that would be protected by attorney-client privelege? Is Van Os involved in Burkett's dirty-tricks campaign while running for the Texas Supreme Court? One thing is certain: his relationship with Burkett allows the long-time Bush hater easy access to the highest levels of the Democratic Party, and if Burkett followed Max Cleland's advice, Van Os' relationship would have made it quite easy for Burkett to be received at Kerry's campaign headquarters.

To: LindyBill who wrote (71480)	9/18/2004 1:46:42 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793938

We conservatives did not defend and stand behind Gingrich enough. I think we shamefully abandoned him. Which is a real shame because he is a great man.

To: LindyBill who wrote (71480)	9/18/2004 1:51:08 PM
From: gamesmistress	Respond to of 793938

Gingrich is kind of forgotten now, isn't he? Nice tribute.

To: LindyBill who wrote (71480)	9/18/2004 2:33:47 PM
From: KLP	Respond to of 793938

Maybe Newt does have the last laugh...He is featured frequently on FOX, comments on the daily events. He has much more visibility than he had in the House, and certainly more than he did while being covered by the likes of CBS. Newt now has the airspace and time to get his actual thoughts out in his own words, not the interpreted words of the so-called journalists.