SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sully- who wrote (49291)9/19/2004 11:08:30 PM
From: CalculatedRiskRespond to of 81568
 
Iraq is a mess. Everyone agrees (except Bush). Even GOP Senators are arguing with Bush to change tactics.

Iraq is a mess. We've lost 54 good men this month alone. We are losing ground. That is not "doom and gloom", that is reality.

The economy is weakening. Look at the numbers.

Vote for a stronger America. Vote Kerry.



To: Sully- who wrote (49291)9/19/2004 11:11:05 PM
From: bentwayRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
Republicans Criticize Bush 'Mistakes' on Iraq
Sun Sep 19, 1:11 PM ET
By Randall Mikkelsen
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Leading members of President Bush (news - web sites)'s Republican Party on Sunday criticized mistakes and "incompetence" in his Iraq (news - web sites) policy and called for an urgent ground offensive to retake insurgent sanctuaries.
In appearances on news talk shows, Republican senators also urged Bush to be more open with the American public after the disclosure of a classified CIA (news - web sites) report that gave a gloomy outlook for Iraq and raised the possibility of civil war.
"The fact is, we're in deep trouble in Iraq ... and I think we're going to have to look at some recalibration of policy," Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel (news, bio, voting record) of Nebraska said on CBS's "Face the Nation."

"We made serious mistakes," said Sen. John McCain (news, bio, voting record), an Arizona Republican who has campaigned at Bush's side this year after patching up a bitter rivalry.

McCain, speaking on "Fox News Sunday," cited as mistakes the toleration of looting after the successful U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003 and failures to secure Iraq's borders or prevent insurgents from establishing strongholds within the country.

He said a ground offensive was urgently needed to retake areas held by insurgents, but a leading Democrat accused the administration of stalling for fear of hurting Bush's reelection chances.

The criticisms came as Bush prepared this week to host Iraqi Prime Minister Iyad Allawi and focus strongly on Iraq after stepped up attacks from Democratic presidential nominee Sen. John Kerry (news - web sites).

After the CIA report was disclosed on Thursday, Kerry accused the president of living in a "fantasy world of spin" about Iraq and of not telling the truth about the growing chaos.

McCain said Bush had been "perhaps not as straight as maybe we'd like to see."

"I think the president is being clear. I would like to see him more clear," McCain said. He said Congress was expected to hold hearings on Iraq soon.

Sen. Richard Lugar (news, bio, voting record), an Indiana Republican and chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, also criticized the administration's handling of Iraq's reconstruction.

Only $1 billion of $18.4 billion allocated by Congress for the task has been spent, Lugar said. "This is the incompetence in the administration," he said on ABC's "This Week."

GROUND OFFENSIVE

A ground offensive was essential to clearing insurgents out of strongholds such as Falluja, McCain said. He joined other lawmakers from both parties who said Iraqi elections scheduled for January would be impossible unless this were done.

The New York Times reported on Sunday that the U.S. military intended to retake Falluja by the end of the year.

"We've got to take out the sanctuaries. We're going to have to sustain, tragically, some more casualties. Airstrikes don't do it; artillery doesn't do it. Boots on the ground do it," McCain said.

"And the longer we delay ...the more difficult the challenge is going to be and the more casualties we will incur," he said.

Sen. John Kyl, like McCain an Arizona Republican, said, "Allowing the Iraqis to make the decisions not to go into some of these sanctuaries, I think, turns out to have not been a good decision, which we're going to have to correct now by going in with our Marines and Army divisions."

Democratic Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware, speaking on ABC, accused the administration of delaying an offensive out of concern it would hurt Bush's bid to win reelection on Nov. 2.

"The only thing I can figure as to why they're not doing it with a sense of urgency is that they don't want to do it before the election and they want to make it seem like everything is status quo," Biden said.

But Kyl said on CBS that time was also needed to train Iraqi troops to help secure areas recaptured from insurgents, and he disputed accusations Bush had not been open about the difficulties in Iraq.

McCain also called for enlarging the U.S. Army by 70,000 soldiers and the Marines by 20,000 to 25,000.

Kerry and other Democrats have said Bush plans to call up more part-time National Guard and Reserve troops after the November election to compensate for thinning ranks in the full-time military due to Iraq. The Bush campaign denied this.

Biden said disappointment with Bush's policies was bipartisan. "Dick Lugar, Joe Biden, Chuck Hagel, John McCain -- we are all on the same page. It is us and the administration. This has been incompetence so far," he said. (additional reporting by Sue Pleming)



To: Sully- who wrote (49291)9/19/2004 11:12:41 PM
From: bentwayRespond to of 81568
 
US intelligence assessment on Iraq in line with global reports
By Farah Stockman, Globe Staff | September 17, 2004

WASHINGTON -- A highly classified US intelligence assessment that lays out dismal predictions for the future of Iraq -- including the possibility of civil war by 2005 -- mirrors assessments that are being made by analysts around the world, according to diplomats and members of the intelligence community.

''You don't have to have classified information and sensitive reporting to come to some kind of judgment," said Judith Yaphe, a former CIA analyst who specializes on Iraq at the National Defense University. ''Anybody can come to those conclusions if they know enough about Iraq and have a brain."

The National Intelligence Estimate prepared for President Bush lays out three possible scenarios for the future of Iraq, a US intelligence official confirmed to the Globe yesterday: The best case is that the war-torn nation maintains a fragile political stability; a second scenario envisions political fragmentation that prevents the creation of a stable democracy; the worst-case scenario is that civil war erupts in Iraq.

The document, about 50 pages long, represents the first broad consensus of the US intelligence community on Iraq since before the invasion. Details of the document were first reported by The New York Times.

A CIA official declined to comment on the assessment, drawn up by the National Intelligence Council this summer to examine the possible outcomes in Iraq's transition period.

But the official said the report, ordered by outgoing CIA director George J. Tenet before he resigned in July, relies on classified intelligence sources from various agencies. It was approved by acting CIA director John McLaughlin and the heads of the other intelligence agencies.

A Western diplomat in Washington who is familiar with some of her country's intelligence assessments on Iraq said the US intelligence estimate seemed to be in line with her country's predictions.

The three scenarios described in the US intelligence document closely mirror public predictions released last week by the Royal Institute of International Affairs, a British think tank also known as Chatham House.

That 26-page report, which also focuses on the transition period that began June 28, when Washington formally handed over sovereignty, predicts that the best possible outcome the United States can hope for is that the interim Iraqi government manages to ''hold together" the various factions of the Shi'ite majority, the Sunni Arab minority, Kurds, and secular Iraqis in a delicate balancing act.

A second scenario predicted by the Chatham House is that ethnic tensions could pull Iraqi society apart, with intervention from Iraq's Turkish, Kurdish, Sunni, and Shi'ite neighbors. The worst scenario, similar to the US document, predicts that Iraq could fragment by the end of 2005.



To: Sully- who wrote (49291)9/19/2004 11:16:54 PM
From: bentwayRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
Bush's message on economy takes beating
Weak job growth, high oil prices, slumping stocks seen aiding Kerry

By Martin Wolk
Chief economics correspondent
MSNBC
Updated: 4:05 p.m. ET Aug. 6, 2004

President Bush’s election-year message that the economy is strong and “getting stronger” is being shaken by a three-pronged assault of weak employment growth, higher oil prices and a slumping stock market.

With less than three months until Election Day, the economic data have taken a sharp turn in favor of Democratic challenger John Kerry that hardly could have been anticipated even a few weeks ago.

Friday’s report that the economy added only 32,000 jobs in July was the latest evidence of a summer slowdown in growth, shocking forecasters who thought employers added 200,000 to 300,000 jobs. It was the second straight month of weak job growth, and it added credibility to Kerry’s refrain that Bush has failed in his handling of the economy, analysts said.

“It allows Kerry to say with some justification that the recovery may be sputtering and that the job market is very soft,” said Greg Valliere, chief strategist of Schwab Washington Research Group. “A lot of people thought when he was saying that earlier in the summer that he was a Cassandra, that he was exaggerating things. But now he can make both those claims.”

A sharp increase in oil prices appears to have had a far bigger impact than expected on consumer spending and business confidence. Consumer spending fell 0.7 percent in June, its worst performance in three years, contributing to a slowdown in overall economic growth for the quarter.

The rising price of oil is the “primary concern” of business executives, who otherwise have “every reason to hire,” said Sung Won Sohn, chief economist at Wells Fargo. A tight supply and rising demand have pushed crude oil prices up 30 percent this year to a record of near $45 a barrel. Resulting higher gasoline prices act as an added tax on motorists, and higher fuel prices pressuring profit margins in many industries.

Only three months ago, the economic data seemed to be swinging clearly in Bush’s favor, as employers added nearly 900,000 jobs over three months, ending the long “jobless recovery.” The nation’s gross domestic product surged in the second half of last year, pushing corporate profits sharply higher. As recently as six weeks ago the stock market, if not dazzling, was cruising along steadily with most indexes at least slightly above last year’s closing levels.

But since late June, the Dow Jones industrial average has fallen 6 percent and the Nasdaq composite index has lost 12 percent. The Dow has lost 3 percent in just the past two sessions, its worst two-day performance since March.

Financial markets have always been seen as an indicator of U.S. economic prospects. But with half of all households invested in the stock market, the benchmark indicators have become important political symbols as well.

Charlie Cook, editor and publisher of the influential Cook Political Report, said the economy and the war on terror are far and away the two most important issues in the campaign, and it is impossible to say which will be more important on Election Day. Early in the year it appeared a string of solid numbers would put the economy onto Bush’s side of the ledger or take it off the table entirely. But that view turned out to be erroneous.

“It’s clear that the economy is still going to be an issue, and it’s still going to be a problem for the president,” Cook said. He said weak job growth is particularly troubling for Bush in battleground states like Ohio, Michigan and Pennsylvania.

“You cannot tell those people that the economy is turning around and that those jobs are coming back,” he said. “It’s not coming back as aggressively as it was, and it’s not coming around as aggressively as it needs to for President Bush.”

Bush, he said, made a mistake by pinning his entire economic platform on his record of cutting taxes rather than taking a more direct approach to creating jobs. In polls, most voters do not believe their overall tax burden has declined despite three years of federal tax cuts, Cook said.

Meanwhile Kerry missed a golden opportunity to exploit President Bush’s vulnerability on the economy at the recent Democratic convention, said Valliere. Instead, Kerry and his running mate John Edwards chose to burnish their credentials to fight the war on terror -- probably the “one issue where Bush beats Kerry,” Valliere said.

Of course there is still plenty of time for Democrats to reshape their message, and they pounced on the employment numbers Friday. On Saturday, the party will launch a new television advertising campaign, accusing Bush of protecting tax breaks that encourage corporations to send jobs overseas.

Under new campaign-finance rules, the campaign is being funded by the Democratic National Committee, acting independently of the Kerry campaign. But the message dovetails perfectly with Kerry’s plan to create 10 million jobs, in part by ending tax incentives for companies that outsource jobs.

© 2004 MSNBC Interactive