SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bentway who wrote (49393)9/20/2004 2:57:10 PM
From: Logain AblarRespond to of 81568
 
I believe you were the one to say read it and weep.

Unlike McCain, Bush, and Gore,,,,Kerry has adamantly refused to authorize
the release of his military records. Most think it's because of his phony
battle medals. I think the real reason is below. He was not granted an
Honorable Discharge until March 2001, almost 30 years after his ostensible
service term had ended! This is very much out of the ordinary, and highly
suspect.
There are 5 classes of Discharge: Honorable, General, Other Than Honorable,
Bad Conduct, and Dishonorable. My guess is that he was Discharged in the
'70s, but not Honorably. He appealed this sometime while Clinton was doing
trouser-tricks in the Oval Office. Political pressure was applied, and the
Honorable Discharge was then granted. His file is probably rife with reports
of this, submissions and hearings on the appeal, reports of his "giving aid
and comfort" to the enemy, along with protests that were filed with respect
to his alleged valor under fire. Hopefully, this will blow up in his face
before October 15th.

On 18 Feb. 1966 John Kerry signed a 6 year enlistment contract with the Navy
(plus a 6-month extension during wartime).

On 18 Feb. 1966 John Kerry also signed an Officer Candidate contract for 6
years -- 5 years of ACTIVE duty & ACTIVE Naval Reserves, and 1 year of
inactive standby reserves (See items #4 & $5).

Because John Kerry was discharged from TOTAL ACTIVE DUTY of only 3 years and
18 days on 3 Jan. 1970, he was then required to attend 48 drills per year,
and not more than 17 days active duty for training. Kerry was also subject
to the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Additionally, Kerry, as a
commissioned officer, was prohibited from making adverse statements against
his chain of command or statements against his country, especially during
time of war. It is also interesting to note that Kerry did not obtain an
honorable discharge until Mar. 12, 2001 even though his service obligation
should have ended July 1, 1972.

Lt. John Kerry's letter of 21 Nov. 1969 asking for an early release from
active US Navy duty falsely states "My current regular period of obligated
service would be completed in December of this year."

On Jan. 3, 1970 Lt. John Kerry was transferred to the Naval Reserve Manpower
Center in Bainridge, Maryland.

Where are Kerry's Performance Records for 2 years of obligated Ready
Reserve, the 48 drills per year required and his 17 days of active duty per
year training while Kerry was in the Ready Reserves? Have these records been
released?

Has anyone ever talked to Kerry's Commanding Officer at the Naval Reserve
Center where Kerry dri! lled?

On 1 July 1972 Lt. J ohn Kerry was transferred to Standby Reserve -
Inactive.
On 16 February 1978 Lt. John Kerry was discharged from US Naval Reserve.

Below are some of the crimes Lt. Kerry USNR committed as a Ready Reservist,
while he was acting as a leader of Vietnam Veterans Against the War:

1. Lt. Kerry attended many rallies where the Vietcong flag was displayed
while our flag was desecrated, defiled, and mocked, thereby giving aid and
comfort to the enemy.

2. Lt. Kerry was involved in a meeting that voted on assassinating members
of the US Senate.

3. Lt. Kerry lied under oath against fellow soldiers before the US Senate
about crimes committed in Vietnam.

4. Lt. Kerry professed to being a war criminal! on national television, and
condemned the military and the USA.

5. Lt. Kerry met with NVA and Vietcong communist leaders in Paris, in direct
violation of the UCMJ and the U.S. Constitution.

Lt. Kerry by his own words & actions violated the UCMJ and the U.S. Code
while serving as a Navy officer. Lt. Kerry stands in violation of Article 3,
Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution. Lt. Kerry's 1970 meeting with NVA
Communists in Paris is in direct violation of the UCMJ's Article 104 part
904, and U.S. Code 18 U.S.C. 953. That meeting, and Kerry's subsequent
support of the communists while leading mass protests against our military
in the year that followed, also place him in direct violation of our
Constitution's Article 3, Section 3, which defines treason as "giving aid
and comfort" to the enemy in time of! warfare.

The Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3, states, "No person shall
be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and
Vice-President ... having previously taken an oath . to support the
Constitution of the United States, [who has] engaged in insurrection or
rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof."

A. L. "Steve" Nash, MAC Ret, UDT/SEAL SEAL Authentication Team -Director
AuthentiSEAL Phone 707 438 0120 "The only service where all investigators
are US Navy SEALs"



To: bentway who wrote (49393)9/20/2004 3:21:21 PM
From: RichnorthRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
In the 6th September 2004 issue of TIME, Joe Klein (one of its editors, was in support of Kerry.

Klein wrote that he himself ventured into Vietnam and heard the stories that very very similar to what Kerry had heard. The rest is now history.

Instead of wasting time on Vietnam which has already been acknowledged by many as a colossal US mistake and one which has plunged the US into a never ending downward spiral of debt/deficits and loss of credibiity and prestige abroad, why not pay more attention on the war in Iraq.

When Allawi comes calling soon, Bush will get him to lie to the American public that, thanks to Bush, the insurgents are desperate and on the run and that only Bush can defeat them once and for all.

BTW, Americans heard something similar about 30-35 years ago when both Johnson and Nixon assured them the war was being won and be over with SOON!!! That SOON period dragged on for a good SEVEN years from 1968 to 1975!!! That happened because of hubris: neither Johnson nor Nixon wanted to be the first president in US history to lose a war! You know, history often repeats itself.
Iraq could well prove to be another colossal mistake and more than a big kick in the butt for the US.