SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Karin who wrote (72333)9/21/2004 1:52:14 PM
From: Bridge Player  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793912
 
This article seems familiar to me. In fact it may be what triggered me to watch the orignal Rather report. Could this have been posted by Lindy on this thread before the broadcast?



To: Karin who wrote (72333)9/21/2004 2:19:06 PM
From: Sig  Respond to of 793912
 
Re Barnes history..
<<<I think this worthy of mention on Drudge, The Washington Post and all other media. Don't you?

I think its worthy to be on the front page of Newsweek, the Wall Street Journal, the LA Times, and placed in the reading racks of every airline.

Sig



To: Karin who wrote (72333)9/21/2004 2:27:48 PM
From: KLP  Respond to of 793912
 
Re Ben Barnes.....

Yes, I mentioned him last night in the list of some questions I have....

How was Ben Barnes really involved in this? Besides changing his mind, and saying he had remembered wrong before (and sworn to it), and now he remembers the right thing....<go figure, he's a Democrat)

Message 20548208

Thanks for posting the Front Page piece....especially interesting considering the date/s....

Dan Rather has LOTS of 'splainin' to do, that's for sure! So does CBS....


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News