SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: yard_man who wrote (12075)9/22/2004 10:58:22 AM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
Asia-Pacific: The Odd Couple

Andy Xie (Hong Kong)

China and Japan have a booming economic relationship; each is the other's second-largest trading partner, just behind the US. But their political relationship is ice-cold. Is the current state of affairs sustainable?

The political tension has not yet affected the economic partnership so far. China just awarded the contract for building the fast train from Shanghai to Beijing to a Japanese company. Japanese companies continue to invest in China.

However, I believe the political tension will eventually affect the economic relationship. All it takes is an event that may cause Chinese to stop buying Japanese goods or Japanese to stop investing in China. The tense relationship between the two countries makes such an event more likely.

The anchor to the long-term stability in East Asia is the robust bilateral relationship between China and Japan. The presence of the US prevents the tension between the two countries from boiling over for now. But it is a temporary and unstable equilibrium.

The economic partnership is booming

I thought that China and Japan were natural partners ('Natural Partners', Financial Times, May 21, 2001). Japan's labor force is stagnating due to aging. It could redeploy its manufacturing capacity to China and import cheap goods to improve the living standard for an aging population. Japan could also export advanced equipment to China for its industrialization. In return, China gains access to a rich export market and advanced industrial equipment.

The bilateral trade has indeed bloomed. Japan's trade with China plus Hong Kong is likely to reach $211 billion, accounting for 20.5% of Japan's total trade and up from $113 billion in 2001. The bilateral trade has grown at 23% per annum since 2001 compared to 9.5% in the previous 16 years. Some of Japan's exports to China are reprocessed for third markets. But, most of the bilateral trade is for mutual demand (see 'Japan's Revival Is a China Phenomenon', May 27, 2004).

China has also benefited greatly from the booming bilateral trade. The employment that Japanese factories have generated is particularly helpful to China. The availability of advanced Japanese equipment has helped China's modernization. The US, for example, still bans exports of advanced equipment to China.

Japanese companies have also helped upgrade the quality of Chinese consumption. From consumer electronics, cars, to cosmetics, Japanese products maintain the highest quality. Chinese businesses are also learning management of large production system and quality control from Japanese businesses.

Why is the economic relationship so beneficial to each other? There are two main reasons. First, China is about 30 years behind Japan in production capability and, hence, does not pose a competitive threat to most businesses in Japan. Second, Japan has an aging population and does not lose much by shipping some production to China. This powerful win-win situation is causing the economic relationship to blossom.

But the political relationship is deteriorating

The top leaders in China and Japan are not visiting each other due to rising political tension. The Chinese government has apparently ceased high-level visits as long as Prime Minister Koizumi continues to visit Yasukuni Shrine where some Class A war criminals are buried.

Both countries suffer increasingly negative media exposure in each other. The Japanese media frequently features crime stories involving Chinese living in Japan. The biggest story on China when I visited Tokyo two weeks ago was how Chinese football fans abused the Japanese football team during the Asian Cup in Asia. The overall tone in Japanese media towards China has become more and more negative.

The Chinese attitude towards Japan is shaped by the experience from the anti-Japanese war that lasted for two decades. The wound has never been closed. Whenever the Japanese government seems ambivalent in acknowledging its war guilt, the Chinese become incensed. In response to the attempts to rewrite history by some groups in Japanese society, the Chinese government has been putting up more museums and monuments to memorize the war past.

When Chinese youth view the materials about the past, they become enraged. As Chinese youth become enraged, they express their sentiment in Internet chat rooms or jeer at Japanese footballers. The Japanese media report such incidents and, without knowing the context, help make the Japanese more negative about China. What is happening is a vicious spiral.

The foundation for the China-Japan relationship is still shaky

I have discovered over many years of visiting Japan that most Japanese actually don't know what happened during the Japanese occupation in China. The official policy to tell as little as possible or whitewash the past in history textbooks is one factor. The fear of discovering something ugly is more important, in my view, to prevent Japanese from learning about the past.

The Japanese are a group-oriented society and believe in collective guilt. If the past were presented in all its gory details, it would make life very difficult for Japanese. This is, I believe, why Japan is trying so hard to forget the past. The elite probably believe that they are doing a good thing for Japan by not imposing such heavy burdens on future generations.

In China, history is lived and relived repeatedly. History is the core of Chinese culture. Chinese people never forget the past. Many peoples invaded China before. But they all became Chinese eventually. I am not suggesting that the Japanese should become Chinese. But, I believe, Chinese people need an emotional closure to what happened. If Japan continues to ignore this, Chinese frustration with Japan would only deepen over time.

Many Japanese believe that time would eventually diminish the impact of the past. This may be true but would take a long time. The negative sentiment towards Japan in China is so deep-rooted and is very hard to dissipate, in my view. I visited some ancient Buddhist caves in Shaanxi Province over the summer. My tour guide, a young girl from a local village, pointed at the missing limbs and heads of Buddhist statues and said angrily, 'Japanese took them'. I ran into a worker the other day who worked at a Japanese factory in Shenzhen. 'I wonder what my grandfather would say about what I am doing', he commented on his job to me. I keep running into ordinary people who have powerful emotions towards Japan.

Towards strengthening the bilateral relationship

The US presence is the main reason that China and Japan are developing their economic relationship rapidly while allowing the political relationship to deteriorate, because both believe that the bad vibes would not spin out of control.

How long could Asia depend on the US presence to cover up their differences? It is a risky proposition to assume that the US will always remain so engaged in Asia. As the US obligations grow elsewhere, it is possible that it could disengage in Asia. If it were to happen, it could trigger an arms race between Japan and China, which would diminish the economic prosperity in East Asia.

A robust partnership between China and Japan is vital to the peace and prosperity in East Asia. To move forward, first, China and Japan should sit down discuss the past. Some sort of catharsis about the past is a necessary condition for building a robust relationship.

Second, China and Japan should enhance the knowledge that Chinese and Japanese have about each other. Stereotypes and prejudices dominate the two peoples' perceptions about each other at present. Increasing tourism and student exchange programs would help.

Third, to anchor the economic partnership, China and Japan should pursue a free trade agreement. The complementarities between the two economies make such an agreement highly beneficial to both. Increasing economic exchanges could enhance the mutual understandings of the two peoples.

Fourth, China and Japan should establish regular military exchanges to enhance mutual trust. Joint military exercises, for example, should be pursued. Some sort of military alliance between China and Japan is the only alternative to the US military presence for East Asian stability.

China and Japan should prepare for the day that the US would disengage from East Asia.

morganstanley.com



To: yard_man who wrote (12075)9/22/2004 11:04:19 AM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
United States: Some Tweaks, But No New Signals From the FOMC

David Greenlaw (New York)

The outcome of the FOMC meeting was as expected — a unanimous vote for a 25 bp rate hike and no change in the formal risk assessment. However, the official statement accompanying the action contained more changes than we had thought likely. Most importantly, the adjustments sent a mixed signal and do not appear aimed at altering expectations for further rate hikes. Indeed, we certainly believe that the FOMC remains on track to tighten again at the November 10 meeting.

Here is a comparison of the wording changes in the statement:

August 10

In recent months, output growth has moderated and the pace of improvement in labor market conditions has slowed. This softness likely owes importantly to the substantial rise in energy prices. The economy nevertheless appears poised to resume a stronger pace of expansion going forward. Inflation has been somewhat elevated this year, though a portion of the rise in prices seems to reflect transitory factors.

September 21

After moderating earlier this year partly in response to the substantial rise in energy prices, output growth appears to have regained some traction, and labor market conditions have improved modestly. Despite the rise in energy prices, inflation and inflation expectations have eased in recent months.

So, the message was more upbeat on the current state of the economy but referenced an easing of inflation and inflation expectations. Admittedly, we were a bit surprised that the FOMC dropped the optimistic forward-looking assessment that had appeared in the August statement ("... poised to resume a stronger pace of expansion going forward"). However, the omission is understandable when viewed in conjunction with the reference to the economy regaining "some traction" in the latest statement. Assuming the Fed now sees Q3 GDP running in the neighborhood of +4%, then a reference to resuming a "stronger pace of expansion going forward" may no longer be valid. In other words, at this point, there is no reason to believe that Q4 growth will be significantly better than +4%. Still, a 4% growth trajectory is strong enough to keep the Fed in tightening mode. Thus, we are not inclined to read too much into this modification in the statement.

Finally, the reference to moderating inflation can be interpreted as an "I told you so" from the Fed. The core CPI has dipped from a year/year pace of +1.9% in June to +1.7% in August. Moreover, the median expected inflation component of the University of Michigan survey has slipped from a peak of +3.3% in the spring to +2.9% in early-September. The Fed has been quite vocal in expressing a view that the run-up in core inflation seen earlier this year would not continue. However, expected inflation is still a bit above the +2.6% average that has prevailed over the prior six years. And, with monthly average core CPI running below 0.1% in the final four months of 2003, the year/year pace should tick up a bit over the balance of this year. From our standpoint, inflation is not going to be a trigger for more Fed tightening anytime soon but, at the same time, the inflation data are unlikely to be a catalyst for a pause in the tightening campaign.

We subscribe to the two-stage tightening theory. In the near term, the bar for further rate hikes is still quite low — the Fed doesn't need strong incoming data to move again in November, just data that is not terribly weak. Further down the road, the bar is likely to be raised and it will take an indication that the economy is expanding faster than the perceived potential growth pace of +3.5% to +3.75% to keep them on a gradual tightening path.

morganstanley.com



To: yard_man who wrote (12075)9/22/2004 12:03:19 PM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116555
 
tippet I do not know even were I can get prices for Uranium.

As to coal my understanding is that there are huge deposits of coal in the north if I am not mistaken Wyoming / Montana. But not sure about the quality of those deposits - e.g. BTU per ton and sulfur content etc.

As to coal my understanding that like crude oil there are many qualities and prices are not equal and related to the BTU per ton - or I am mistaken ? How is coal priced anyway?

With low interest rates does a nuclear plant make more sense? (ignoring the environmental of not in my back yard theme)