Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (203650)	9/22/2004 2:21:08 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576816

Actually, it is very likely that Burkett set himself up for humiliation, given that he's got a king-sized axe to grind with Bush. You contradict yourself. A king-sized axe calls for caution and craftyness, not a sudden rash writup of memos on his home PC. I have no doubt that Burkett wanted to get these memos out to hurt Bush, but that only leads to the conclusion that he must have thought they would accomplish that task, which they would only do if he thought they were genuine. TP

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (203650)	9/22/2004 5:04:48 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576816

And calling the effort "amateurish" is a rather audacious thing to say now, given how many liberals were initially in denial over the forgeries. Perhaps that's an even better reason to believe the Rove conspiracy theory, because the alternative would be to admit being suckered by a liberal partisan running Microsoft Word. You keep forgetting that while the memos might be forgeries, the content was not according to Killian's secretary. So why are you continuing to carry on about the forged memos? Are you after the truth or simply playing partisan politics?