Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rock_nj who wrote (49782)	9/22/2004 2:57:41 PM
From: Karen Lawrence	Respond to of 81568

Great post. Everyone should read it. Many Americans are apathetic. Make that "pathetic". The only thing Bush runs on are his specious attacks against Kerry.

To: Rock_nj who wrote (49782)	9/22/2004 3:06:37 PM
From: sea_biscuit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

What does Bush have to do to lose? 1. Initiate a military draft that would send our youngsters to the Middle East (Iran, Iraq, Syria...) 2. Initiate massive cuts in services for the middle-class and the poor. 3. Allow his corporate sponsors to offshore more and more of our jobs. He won't do these now, for if does, he will lose. But he is certain to do each and every one of the above if gets elected this time.

To: Rock_nj who wrote (49782)	9/22/2004 3:53:30 PM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 81568

George Bush, Master of Sanctimony _________________________________ by Matthew Rothschild Published on Wednesday, September 22, 2004 by The Progressive Two years ago, when George Bush addressed the United Nations on Iraq, he blustered that the U.N. risked becoming irrelevant if it didn't do what he wanted it to do, which was to go along for the Iraq ride. Bush told Bob Woodward in Plan of Attack that "it was a speech I really enjoyed giving." While Bush was not quite so haughty this time around, he still seemed to be enjoying himself as he laid the sanctimony on thick. He warned the delegates "not to grow weary in our duties, or waver in meeting them." He boasted that "we have the historic chance . . . to fight radicalism and terror with justice and dignity," willfully ignoring the Abu Ghraib scandal that has so besmirched the U.S. reputation abroad. On Iraq and Afghanistan today, he said, "Freedom is finding a way," and that both peoples "are on the path to democracy and freedom." It must be a slippery path, though, and a difficult way. Bush hinted at this by saying, "The work ahead is demanding." But he used this acknowledgment to upbraid the delegates: "The proper response to difficulty is not to retreat, it is to prevail." Amazingly, he said, "The people of Iraq have regained sovereignty," even though they are being ruled by a former CIA asset appointed by the Iraqi Governing Council, which Bush's viceroy, Paul Bremer, handpicked. Bush's entire discussion about Iraq reeked of hubris. Just last week, U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan called the Iraq War "illegal," but Bush said "a coalition of nations enforced the just demands of the world." Once again, he simply assumed that the United States has the right to be the unilateral enforcer of U.N. Security Council resolutions, even when the Security Council itself does not agree. To give those resolutions meaning and "for the sake of peace" (calling George Orwell), Bush said the war against Saddam Hussein was necessary. Bush did not mention the elusive weapons of mass destruction, incidentally. Instead, he emphasized that the war against Iraq this time was to "deliver the Iraqi people from an outlaw dictator." On the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, Bush, as is his custom, spent much more time and much stronger language berating Yasser Arafat, though not by name, than in scolding the Israeli government. This imbalance must have been clear to people in the Arab and Muslim world. Bush did denounce the crimes in the Darfur region of Sudan, "crimes my government has concluded are genocide." But he was short on any follow through that is necessary to stop that genocide. The only new initiative he offered during his entire speech was the establishment of something he called a Democracy Fund to help set up "independent courts, a free press, political parties, and trade unions." Trade unions? Since when has Bush been a supporter of them? Bush added, "Money from the fund would also help set up voter precincts and poling places, and support the work of election monitors." We may need those election monitors here on November 2. Throughout the speech, the U.N. delegates sat on their hands. At the end, there was only the politest applause. Resentment against Bush the Bully ran high. Copyright 2004 The Progressive ### commondreams.org