SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jlallen who wrote (24797)9/22/2004 4:13:58 PM
From: Suma  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
I have just posted some of what I have received in my mail and frankly have not read them all in totality yet. But will do it. Have posted so much in the past ten minutes that you will have to refer me to the specific post. Since what I post is documented from sources with web pages etc.. doesn't it explain the response to this question ?
Check the site . Is the statement not linked ?



To: jlallen who wrote (24797)9/22/2004 4:19:14 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
The articles refer to the alleged Niger yellowcake story....

The trouble with using this to say Bush cited forged documents is twofold.....

1. Bush never cited the forged documents or Niger but instead a Brit intel report about Iraqi activity in Africa which Brit intel stands behind to this day.....

2. It has since been determined that Joe Wilson's report was not accurately reported to Congress and that in fact as a result of his report the allegations of Iraqi activity to obtain nuclear materials in Africa was STRENGHTENED not weakened.....

The lying liberal press at it again making excuses for Kerry and slandering President Bush.....