SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Proof that John Kerry is Unfit for Command -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (11790)9/22/2004 6:55:57 PM
From: American Spirit  Respond to of 27181
 
Bush is not responsible for Abu Graib? Why not? CEO's are always responsible for what their employees do especially if it's ongoing and known about. SO what is Bush responsible for> Anything?

For Iraq blunders and lies? for 2 trillion deficits? for going AWOL? For ignoring warnings and letting 9-11 happen? For energy gouging fraud? for cheating in Florida? Bush is not responsible for anything. He gets a free silver spoon pass because his last name is Bush, the most elite rich kid on the planet. He gets a pass for everything.



To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (11790)9/22/2004 9:05:37 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27181
 
Notice how the Kerryites all like the word "smearvet"? Smearing vets is what Kerry did to gain national attention in the early '70's. Now he'd doing it again to defend himself from his fellow servicemen who say he's unfit for command. Plus he denigrates national guard service. Smearvet really describes Kerry's political career and the theme of his campaign.