SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Pravin Kamdar who wrote (133630)9/23/2004 6:39:31 PM
From: dougSF30Respond to of 275872
 
Pravin, don't confuse a general 104W 90nm TDP with the power dissipation of a 90nm 3800+.

In general, AMD wants only one TDP for all desktop parts at a given node. (89W for 130nm)

Apparently, they made an exception this time, and instead of just rating all 90nm parts at 104W (leaving room for dual-core), they said, okay, we'll further guarantee that the 3000+, 3200+, and 3500+ will be 89W TDP, and thus work with all existing 939 mobos.)

(One other exception may be the 130nm 2.6 GHz FX-55, rumored to be getting the same 104W TDP)

As for a 90nm 2.4 GHz 3800+ ? Well, once they relax the limit all the way to 104W, they could ship parts that actually get that high... but what would the average part dissipate? I don't know. What does the *average* 130nm 3800+ dissipate? 89W? or 85W? Lower? Without knowing that, it is hard to predict the average for 90nm 3800+...

If not average, would you like say, 90% percentile?

Doug



To: Pravin Kamdar who wrote (133630)9/23/2004 7:34:20 PM
From: combjellyRespond to of 275872
 
"But, that alone does not imply that they have hit a speed limit."

They haven't even officially launched, and people are talking about it hitting a wall?