SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Knighty Tin who wrote (12237)9/24/2004 3:51:46 PM
From: ThirdEye  Respond to of 116555
 
Your link on the DeLay post was to Flecks comments on FNM. Can we blame FNM on The Hammer?

And as far as seeing the DeLay deal on TV, maybe CBS could take a whack at it.<g> The others are too afraid of losing viewers.



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (12237)9/24/2004 3:53:06 PM
From: Pogeu Mahone  Respond to of 116555
 
<<When are they going to start covering the DeLay scandal on tv? Message 20560587 >>



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (12237)9/24/2004 10:41:43 PM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116555
 
Twin peaks in equity and housing prices?

Very interesting article written in March that suggests housing peaks occur 1 year after equity peaks, later if there are declining rates.

bis.org



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (12237)9/25/2004 12:35:52 AM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
U.S. keeping crash data secret

Officials backtrack on safety disclosure amid suit by tire makers

September 24, 2004

BY JEFFREY McCRACKEN
FREE PRESS BUSINESS WRITER

Federal auto safety officials are backtracking on a pledge to give consumers access to detailed data on which cars and trucks may be linked to deaths, injuries and property damage. The reason: Tire makers have sued to prevent its release.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) says it will hold off indefinitely on releasing the information while the lawsuit by the country's largest tire makers is argued and decided, which could take months, if not years. Consumer advocates have been clamoring for the release of such data since the 2000 Ford-Firestone rollover debacle.

Auto experts say these data on vehicle deaths, injuries, property damage and what specific parts may have caused the problem would be of great interest to car and truck shoppers, who often make their buying decisions based on a vehicle's safety records and reliability.

"If you own a car or truck and have a problem with it, or are shopping for a new car or truck, you'd want to see if there were a number of deaths or injuries with that vehicle. It's really disheartening to see NHTSA opting for secrecy in the area of vehicle safety," said Sally Greenberg, senior product safety counsel for Consumers Union, which publishes Consumer Reports magazine.

Until last week, the government said it had made or would make available to the public the new vehicle safety data, including details on the make, model and year of a vehicle in which someone died or was injured, and what vehicle part or system may have caused the accident.

But following a Freedom of Information Act request by the Free Press, NHTSA last week acknowledged this informationwas not available -- as it had said earlier. It also acknowledged it would not be made public until it deals with the lawsuit filed in June by the Rubber Manufacturers Association, a group that represents tire makers such as Bridgestone, Goodyear and Continental.

"We had intended to make all of that information public, the claims data on deaths and property damage, but then we got sued. Because of the lawsuits filed against us, we're holding off on disclosing any further information until we see the outcome of this," said Rae Tyson, NHTSA spokesman. "We're waiting until we get further guidance from the courts."

Consumer-interest groups and vehicle-safety advocates, many of whom already felt like NHTSA was withholding too much vehicle safety data, were outraged at NHTSA's reversal.

"I think the more the government decides to keep data under lock and key, the more they put the public at risk," said Greenberg. "The whole idea should be to provide the public with advanced warning about vehicle hazards, which is exactly what didn't happen in the Ford-Firestone situation."

NHTSA began receiving this new early-warning vehicle-safety data in December 2003 as part of the TREAD Act, a much-publicized law passed in 2000 in response to the rollovers of Ford Motor Co. Explorers equipped with certain Firestone tires. U.S. officials have linked 271 deaths to wrecks involving tread separation of Bridgestone Corp.'s Firestone tires. Most were on Explorers.

Automakers and tire makers fought to keep all of that new vehicle safety data out of the public eye, arguing as long as NHTSA saw it, that was all that mattered. Consumer-interest groups, pushed to make all the data public, saying it was valuable to auto consumers and auto-safety groups.

Often unspoken was the concern by business interests that the data would be used by trial lawyers to sue automakers or tire makers. Businesses also complained the public would be misled by the data.

NHTSA came down in the middle. In a two-paragraph ruling buried deep within the Federal Register this spring, the agency decided to make public the data on deaths, injuries and property damage -- while keeping secret data about car and truck warranty claims, customer complaints and early-warning defect reports from auto dealers.

NHTSA defended the decision to keep some information confidential by noting it was disclosing the other data on deaths, injuries and property damage -- the same data it is now keeping secret. TREAD has resulted so far in at least one small piece of new data being made public: warranty recalls in foreign countries.

The consumer-advocacy group Public Citizen sued NHTSA in April, seeking release of all the data. Public Citizen's lawyer said he was puzzled by the NHTSA reversal, while the Rubber Manufacturers Association applauded it.

"The agency knows there is broad interest in this safety data, the data on deaths and property damage. They themselves concluded that in the rule-making process," said Scott Nelson, a lawyer for Public Citizen, based in Washington, D.C. "Now the vehicle-safety information the agency said would be there for the public is being held hostage for months or years while both sides debate and argue the case."

Nelson said NHTSA caved in to the tire makers' lawsuit without requiring them to win a temporary restraining order to prevent release of the safety data.

The Rubber Manufacturers Association -- which filed its suit in June insisting none of the data should be made public --applauded the NHTSA decision, saying the data on deaths, injuries and property damage wouldn't be helpful to consumers.

"Our position is this early-warning data shouldn't be made public, even if the information is accurate. That information is just for the trained federal safety regulators to use," said association spokesman Dan Zielinski. "Our feeling is the data should remain confidential unless NHTSA forms an investigation. There's already plenty of information out there for the public."

He also expressed a typical concern of business groups -- that trial lawyers would use the safety data to file lawsuits against them.

"We wouldn't want a situation where this data was abused. The trial lawyers would find this data interesting to pore through. They are clever people and can make anything sound unsafe, even when it's not," said Zielinski.

Changing positions

The NHTSA decision is an abrupt about-face for the agency in charge of vehicle safety. In an Oct. 27, 2000, memo, NHTSA said it disagreed with the tire makers and other business groups who wanted to prohibit disclosure of all new data coming to NHTSA under the TREAD act.

NHTSA spokesman Tyson said the agency feels like it's being squeezed between one lawsuit by Public Citizen demanding more public disclosure and one from the tire makers demanding less.

"We are caught in the middle, so the courts will have to decide. In the meantime, we are not going to make public any information until we hear from the courts," he said.

The tire makers' lawsuit is not supported by automakers or their trade association, the Alliance of Auto Manufacturers. The alliance has taken the position that NHTSA's original stance -- releasing just the data on vehicle-related deaths, injuries and property damage -- is the proper way to go.

"We have not sought to expand the scope of protection of information beyond the current NHTSA rule," said Erika Jones, lawyer for the Alliance.

NHTSA has yet to officially respond to the Free Press FOIA requests of Aug. 24, which sought access to both the data that was supposed to be public as well as that which the agency had previously decided to keep confidential. On Sept. 22, NHTSA chief counsel Jacqueline Glassman sent an e-mail to the Free Press seeking a 10-day extension on the requests. She also said NHTSA was "considering issues relating to requests for confidential treatment pending the litigation."

freep.com



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (12237)9/25/2004 1:08:03 AM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
FRUGAL TO A FAULT
by Bill Bonner

There was a time when thrift was a virtue. "A penny saved
is a penny earned," dead people whisper.

Accountants with sharp pencils even noticed that a penny
saved was more than a penny earned, 40- 50% more; it was
not subject to state, local and federal income taxes.

But now thrift is regarded no longer as a virtue, but as a
mental disorder.

Evidence comes from a magazine spotted on Long Island, via
Grant's Interest Rate Observer. The publication, entitled
Real Simple, tells the story of a poor woman named Morning
Naughton, 34 years old in the flesh, hundreds of years old,
perhaps, in spirit.

If the phone doesn't ring at an expensive jewelry store
this morning, it will be Ms. Naughton who is not calling.
If there is no one admiring the new SUVs in a North
Carolina showroom, it will be Ms. Naughton who has stayed
at home.

If you were to check the credit card records for sales of
expensive vacations, fancy hotel rooms, extravagant fur
coats or top restaurants, you would not find Ms. Naughton's
name.

Alas, says Real Simple, the woman has a real problem; she
is "frugal to a fault."
"She has never had credit card debt, she pays all her bills
on time and she typically saves $500 each month - on a
salary of about $30,000," we are told.
"Her husband, Jason Michaels... worries about her inability
to indulge herself... or him." The plot thickens. "And he
wonders if her scrimping sends the wrong message to their
child. "I realize she can't help herself," says Jason. "But
her obsession with saving can drive me nuts."

But never was there a problem under the bright sun of
America 2004 that didn't have some sort of fraud creeping
in the shadows of its debt bubble. Reading about Ms.
Naughton, economists are likely to see a threat; if other
consumers were to do the same, the whole shebang would be
in trouble. Psychologists, on the other hand, will quickly

see an opportunity; some may prepare 12-step programs to
help overcome it. Others will offer drugs and counseling.
For the present, both economists and psychologists can
relax. If frugality is a disorder, it is too rare to worry
about. The odds of coming down with it are as remote as
integrity in public office.

Besides, thrift - even if it is a disorder - is one that
comes and goes. If people are saving too much, or too
little, just wait.

Ms. Naughton - through no fault of her own - tumbled into
an unusual situation. One generation creates; the next
dissipates. One generation earns; the next burns. One
generation composes, the next disposes. Morning Naughton
was merely born at the wrong time.

"In the '70s," begins a letter from a Daily Reckoning
reader, "I recall seeing many people, children of the
Depression, ravaged by inflation. They remembered the 'bad
times' and were loath to take on debt - even if it would
have been prudent to borrow and pay back in cheaper
dollars. In the face of rising prices, they would slam
their wallets shut or buy used, rather than new - 'I'd
never pay that much for a new car!' They held their
dollars, steadfastly refusing inflation hedges, and
watched, even increased their dollar position, as the
inflation storm ravaged their holdings."

"When Morning was 9," continues the Real Simple analysis,
"her parents divorced, and she moved with her father to
Cape Cod. Her dad did some construction work to make money,
but he was an artist at heart... She worked at a multitude
of odd jobs, including baby sitting, to make money. At age
10, she opened her first savings account. At 13, she
started paying all the bills by filling out the information
and having her dad sign the checks...
'My childhood left me with this extreme anxiety about
parting with money. I always need a safety net.'"

She may be the only American on two legs who still worries
about falling. But she can always try therapy.
"Were it not for her husband and child, Morning... might
not be motivated to change," Real Simple explains.
"After more than 20 years of belt-tightening, Morning knows
she needs to relax. 'I don't want [my son] Spencer to grow
up with the same money anxieties I have,' she says. 'Being
so frugal has become a burden, and I want to change. But
it's hard after a lifetime of being this way.'"

We wish her luck. But we offer advice: Don't change too
much. Old habits might turn out to be useful. Our Daily
Reckoning correspondent from Pittsburgh offers this
insight:

"Now everything seems reversed. In this deflationary
environment, people are spending like crazy, afraid that
the low prices they see are going to evaporate, convinced
that debt will always be paid back in cheaper dollars.
When I drive around, I don't see old cars anymore - the
oldest cars on the road seem to be 5 or 6 years old. Seeing
a 10-year old car is an oddity. Two years ago, I bought a
TV with a MSRP of $1,299 for $850 and paid 50 bucks to have
it shipped across the country, because it was the best
price. A year ago, we sold the TV when we moved and
replaced it for $600 at a local store. Four months ago, I
found out my parents' set died, and I bought them the
identical set for $450.

"I finally began to catch on to this deflation business,
but a little voice in my head keeps screaming: 'That's a
great deal! Buy now! Buy now! Buy now!' I'm 'built' on
inflationary expectations - as, I'm convinced, most
Americans are. People are spending their dollars, their
un-secured credit lines, even their homes. The dollars are
gone, the credit cards and home equity lines maxed, and the
low prices are still there - frequently perversely taunting
the consumer by going lower still.

"Frankly, I've enjoyed the shopping spree, but dollars are
starting look a lot more valuable than I thought they
would. Wouldn't it be ironic if the Fed couldn't destroy
the dollar even if it tried... "

If the Fed cannot destroy the currency, saving dollars
could become popular again. Who knows? Frugality could make
a comeback. It always does.

Regards,

Bill Bonner
The Daily Reckoning



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (12237)9/25/2004 1:13:01 AM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
From the Daily reckoning

"Deflation is still a bigger threat than inflation," said
BCA economist Martin Barnes to Barron's. "It is still a
highly competitive world, and there is still the whole Asia
supply story out there. Technology is still a
disinflationary force in the sense that it encourages more
competition and pushes prices down. The Internet is a true
force for competition and low prices.

"The Fed has talked in the past about creating a firebreak
against deflation by getting inflation up enough and
interest rates up enough so that if there is a negative
shock to the economy, there will be a cushion to protect
against deflation...

"They haven't been able to achieve that... that tells you
that there is a deflationary tone to the world."

A deflationary tone is a flat one. Like an opera singer
after a lobotomy. Prices are generally flat or falling.
Employment is sluggish. GDP growth stalls. The consumer
runs low on money and cuts back. The whole economy turns
"mushy," as Barnes puts it. People haven't saved enough, he
says, and "expectations are too high."

People expect Social Security, pensions, rising stock
prices, full employment, happy marriages, abundant
gasoline, ATM machines on every street corner, low rates of
interest, food that won't make you fat, wealth without
saving and free drugs from the government from here to
eternity.

"There was a grave and dangerous arrogance in this touching
confidence," wrote Stefan Zweig in 1942, "that we had
barricaded ourselves to the last loophole against any
possible invasion of fate. In its liberal idealism, the
19th century was honestly convinced that it was on the
straight and narrow path toward being the best of all
worlds."

If only Zweig could see us now!

Now, as at the end of the 19th century, fate waits outside
the gate. Ready to bash it in.