Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ali Chen who wrote (133797)	9/25/2004 1:36:36 AM
From: Elmer Phud	Respond to of 275872

Mr Chin It looks like a production sample It sounds like an oxymoron.

To: Ali Chen who wrote (133797)	9/25/2004 2:15:23 AM
From: dougSF30	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

What does it says about the amount of efforts Is that a babelfish translation? Doug

To: Ali Chen who wrote (133797)	9/25/2004 9:04:29 AM
From: combjelly	Respond to of 275872

"BTW, the chip marking doesn't say "ES". It looks like a production sample. Sorry." So? It is still a single report that might be using a higher than spec. voltage. It might be indicative of something, or it just might be an outlier. Who knows? This is a little different than with Prescott. There were lots of rumors about Prescotts being little power hogs before it was introduced. So far this is the only report of 90nm A64s running hotter than 130nm. And even then, not by a whole lot.