Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (204174)	9/28/2004 9:25:41 AM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575625

John, I didn't give a damn about Afghanistan or the Taliban for that matter, except that they were on the way to getting bin Laden and the rest of al Qaeda. We should have done everything in our power to get those al Qaeda (short of nukes) swiftly and brutally. That would have made us significantly safer today, and would have sent a message. I rhink you are missing a one point, which can partly explain your overall confusion. The fight of Jihadists vs. the civilized world may have started with Al Qaeda as an organizing force of the Jihadists, but it by no means ends there. While I agree that we should kill as many of Al Qaeda members (and just about every armed Arab entering Iraq), doing so will not be the end of this. Joe

To: Road Walker who wrote (204174)	9/28/2004 10:55:36 AM
From: Alighieri	Respond to of 1575625

The message now is that you can get away with attacking the US, and survive. The message also is that you must have nukes in your arsenal...and if you do, the US will relegate your situation to a negotiated solution with the regional powers. Bunch of Appeasers that they are. Al