Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (12386)	9/28/2004 11:49:56 AM
From: mishedlo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116555

A series of great posts on these issues. Thanks KT Mish

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (12386)	9/28/2004 11:56:59 AM
From: mishedlo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116555

Hunnj on the FOOL on FNM I keep seeing posts suggesting that Fannie Mae will need to issue bonds or sell assets in order to bring its capital requirements into line. The first option cannot possibly work at all and the second is not likely to work. Look at the accounting equation: Assets = Liabilities + Equity At 12/31/03 FNM looked like this (numbers in millions): Assets $1,009,569 (as in $1 trillion) Liab $987,196 Equity $22,373 Let's say they issue $10 billion in bonds. Then the numbers become: Assets $1,019,569 Liab $997,196 Equity $22,373 Not only does equity not change, but the debt to equity ratio is worse. Let's say they sell $10 billion in assets and use the proceeds to retire debt. Then the numbers become: Assets 999,569 Liab 977,196 Equity $22,373 Equity is unchanged and the debt/equity ratio is only marginally better. If it's possible they have assets with unrecognized gains of $10 billion and they sell them, then it changes the picture. The unrecognized gains would flow to equity on the gain on sale. Let's say they sell $50 billion in assets which have not been marked to market and have a $10 billion gain. They use the proceeds to retire debt. Then the numbers become: Assets $979,569 Liab $947,196 Equity 32,373 The accounting on this works out but how likely is it that they have $10 billion in unrecognized gains? Not very. Their problem is assets with unrecognized losses. This leaves two likely options: 1) Issue stock. A $10 billion stock sale yields the following: Assets $1,019,569 Liab $987,196 Equity 32,373 This looks the same on the balance sheet as selling an asset sale with unregognized gains but the income statement would show no profit on the transaction as the asset sale would. 2) A gift (from whom do you suppose?) Assets $1,019,569 Liab $987,196 Equity 32,373 In this case there would be a profit as money has dropped from heaven ... well actually most likely the Fed.

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (12386)	9/28/2004 1:55:48 PM
From: XBrit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116555

My thought is, is it too late to change the result of the civil war? If we could retroactively declare the north to have lost, all those republican southern states would be in a different country from California and New York. They'd probably like that too, huh.