SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (204192)9/28/2004 1:54:36 PM
From: Joe NYC  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572903
 
TegerPaw,

It would have been vastly better to clean up Afganistan and Central Asia before taking on completely optional wars.

That does not address the point that there was far less planning for the war in Afghanistan, and if we waited and planned the way the Monday morning quarterbacks say we should have for Iraq, Taliban would still be in power.

Joe



To: TigerPaw who wrote (204192)9/28/2004 4:21:47 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1572903
 
Under your scenario, Taliban and Saddam would still be in power

The Taliban had nothing to do with Saddam.
It would have been vastly better to clean up Afganistan and Central Asia before taking on completely optional wars.

Did you note that he gave Bush a B- for post operative cleanup in Iraq? Its senseless to discuss the issue with them.

ted


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News