Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GST who wrote (146516)	9/28/2004 2:21:06 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I not only think it, I am sure of it. Of course we hope for a basing agreement, but vindication of our position is paramount, and we will not remain in Iraq if the elected government asks us to leave.

To: GST who wrote (146516)	9/28/2004 2:27:00 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

You can take my words to mean whatever you want of course. However, the meanings you have derived are your own and have little baring on anything I said. You are venturing down the hazy path of implication and innuendo. I prefer not to follow you. However, I do have some questions. 1) What specific problem do you have with the establishment of the largest US Embassy being built in Iraq? 2) Why is it a problem for you that US military bases are being built in Iraq? 3) Upon what do you base your prophesy regarding Sadr et al... and our 'exit' strategy? 4) What do you mean by, wanting to 'control Iraq', since that seems to be your primary problem with our circumstances.