SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Raymond Duray who wrote (57533)9/28/2004 11:09:49 PM
From: Dan B.  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 89467
 
There you are, without a shred of rebuttal....LOL. Don't you comprehend how your words to me thus reflect upon yourself? Devoid of reason you spout ad hominem argument, while you support the case I've made against your rabid thoughts all the while. Remove the word BUSH from your post and substitute...um...let the reader choose the appropriate name...Marx perhaps...and we have I believe, an accurate description of you.

Dan B.



To: Raymond Duray who wrote (57533)9/28/2004 11:20:30 PM
From: SiouxPal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
But Raymond you always look better than your competition.
That is a good thing.
They fabricate,you educate.

SiouxPal



To: Raymond Duray who wrote (57533)9/29/2004 7:42:22 AM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 89467
 
Ray, you are just a wacko name thrower, go back under your bed in your parents' basement.



To: Raymond Duray who wrote (57533)9/29/2004 9:14:21 AM
From: LPS5  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Now I realize that you are pathologically and willfully ignorant.

He's "willfully ignorant" because he raised questions and challenged the assertions made in your post?

Are you sure you're responding to the correct post?

You scare me.

Undoubtedly, and therein lies the very stuff of the "ignore" feature.

I don't know how someone can be so willfully blind as you are. You're the perfect Nazi footsoldier...

An interesting comment, in particular when made within the context of responding to this post:

Message 20578570

It's worthy of highlighting due to its instructive value. Viz,

You're asserting that the information you post is, as you described it, "unassailable"...that he, I, anyone, should accept such unquestioningly....and yet he is the "perfect Nazi footsoldier"?

ROFL!!!

...willing to believe anything a corrupt and tyrannical despot like George Bush will try to make you swallow.

What does this have to do with George Bush? If I'm not mistaken, Dan was responding to a post wherein you quoted a simple message on another message board forum. Correct?

You are completely unworthy of being taken seriously.

As I see it, until/unless you respond to the points he raised with evidence supporting the "unassailably correct" positions you're promoting - as opposed to the tired reiteration of your standard melodramatic, empty emotionalism - it's you who fall short of the threshold of legitimacy.

LPS5



To: Raymond Duray who wrote (57533)9/29/2004 1:50:41 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Rove Rage
________________

Josh Green of the Atlantic Monthly has a very good piece detailing how Karl Rove has built his 34-7 lifetime record: by fighting dirty when he's backed into a corner.

Check it out here:

theatlantic.com

'Karl Rove is at his most formidable when running close races, and his skills would be notable even if he used no extreme methods. But he does use them. His campaign history shows his willingness, when challenged, to employ savage tactics'



To: Raymond Duray who wrote (57533)9/30/2004 8:37:44 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Pssst... Ray: Election in 4 1/2 weeks. No coup. What's going on?