SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : John Kerry for President? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (1692)9/29/2004 11:35:26 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Respond to of 3515
 
Message 20583192

You dumb klutz. Everyone on SI has a profile.



To: American Spirit who wrote (1692)9/30/2004 12:19:31 AM
From: Glenn Petersen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3515
 
Lies from John Kerry:

townhall.com

Kerry's myth making<?b>

Robert Novak

September 30, 2004

WASHINGTON -- John Kerry in a press conference last week repeated his accusation that Gen. Eric Shinseki was "forced out" as U.S. Army chief of staff because he wanted more troops for Iraq. The trouble is that the Democratic presidential nominee was spreading an urban myth. The bigger trouble is that it was no isolated incident.

Sen. Kerry last week also said the Bush administration may push reinstatement of the military draft, when in fact that idea comes only from anti-war Democrats. At the same time, he said retired Gen. Tommy Franks complained that Iraq was draining troops from Afghanistan, when the truth is he never did. Over a week earlier, Kerry blamed Bush for higher Medicare premiums when in fact they are mandated by law (one that Kerry voted for).

Exaggeration is a familiar political staple, but presidential candidates usually are held to a higher standard. Kerry's recent descent into myth making may reflect the campaign's anxiety in the final weeks. The immediate questions are whether he will engage in misstatements during Thursday's first presidential debate, and whether he will be challenged if he does.

Kerry is voicing inaccurate statements that have been repeated so often on the Internet, on radio talk shows and by campaign surrogates that they have come to be regarded as the truth -- for example, the explanation for how Eric Shinseki's long and distinguished military career ended.

Kerry picked up the story April 13 during a campaign event in Providence, R.I., declaring: "Gen. Shinseki said very clearly: We need 200,000 troops. And what happened to him? He was forced into early retirement." Kerry reiterated this last week at a Columbus, Ohio, press conference: "Gen. Shinseki told this country how many troops we'd need. The president retired him early for telling the truth."

That is not true, and even Bush critics in the Pentagon know it. The truth is that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, demanding control of the Army, collided with Shinseki on issues unrelated to Iraq. In March 2002, Rumsfeld announced that Shinseki's term as chief of staff would end as scheduled in June 2003 without extension -- an unprecedented action that made the general a lame duck. It was after that, not before it, on Feb. 25, 2003, that Shinseki told a Senate committee the U.S. would need "several hundred thousand" soldiers (not precisely 200,000) for Iraq occupation duty.

In his Philadelphia speech Sept. 24, Kerry declared: "All you have to do is ask Gen. Tommy Franks how surprised he was that those troops moved out of there (Afghanistan) when he was trying to do the job he was doing." As a former trial lawyer, Kerry should have known the answer to the question he was asking. He could have known by reading Franks' best-selling memoir ("American Solider"), in which the general denies that Bush starved Afghanistan for the sake of Iraq.

"President Bush had stressed his concern that we maintain momentum in Afghanistan," wrote Franks (who supports the president's re-election). Indeed, when Kerry in a Sept. 21 press conference in Jacksonville, Fla., suggested that Bush had taken needed troops out of Afghanistan, Franks that very day said in an ABC radio interview with Sean Hannity: "That's absolutely incorrect."

One day after Kerry misrepresented the former Central Command commander in chief, the Associated Press reported that the candidate at West Palm Beach, Fla., "raised the possibility" of a reinstated draft. That is an old saw on the Internet even though there are no such plans at the Pentagon. The only advocates of renewed conscription are liberal Democrats, led by Rep. Charlie Rangel of New York, who believe it would discourage U.S. military intervention around the world.

Earlier, on Sept. 8 in Cincinnati, Kerry put the blame on Bush for higher Medicare premiums. In fact, health care experts told me, the premiums were mandated by a 1997 codification of the law on which Sen. Kerry cast a favorable vote.

On Jan. 8, 1976, I wrote a column detailing six major untruthful statements by Jimmy Carter -- about himself, not his opponents -- during two public appearances. He went on to the presidency without ever refuting what I wrote. It will be interesting to see whether John Kerry follows the Carter model during the four weeks left for this campaign.



To: American Spirit who wrote (1692)9/30/2004 5:53:13 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™  Respond to of 3515
 
You have no business on the Internet, you're a fake and a phony... what kind of business do you have? Liar!!! If you did, you would know the word Internet is capitalized, you jackass baby killer supporter... kerry killed babies...

GZ



To: American Spirit who wrote (1692)9/30/2004 8:31:41 AM
From: JakeStraw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3515
 
John Kerry's Biggest Problem Is John Kerry

by J. B. Williams
Saturday, September 04, 2004

John Kerry is not short of troubles these days, from his 20-year Senate career that he left completely off of his resume, to his poor choice of advisors like Sandy ''burglar'' Berger, or his visible inability to settle into one solid position on any single issue.

But John Kerry's real problem is just now coming into focus for many who knew little about the man, despite a 20-year high-roller Washington career and his 30-year jet-set, ski-slope, summer-in-France persona.



It’s no surprise that Kerry finds himself in the eye of a political firestorm that threatens to end his life in politics. Those of us who have watched him for 20 years or more, have been wondering when his road to the White House was going to run upon one of the many bridges he burned along the way.



It’s fitting that those brothers he chose to malign 30 years ago, lead the charge to topple his political kingdom 30 years later. Despite Kerry’s efforts to characterize their attack as some vast right wing conspiracy, the truth is much more obvious than that.



I’m reminded of the old saying, ''Watch who you trample over on your way up, because you will see them all again on your way down.''



The Swift-Vet charges only serve to bring John Kerry’s real problem into our field of vision. His real problem is his snobbish liberal elitist personality that causes him to feel superior to his loyal and not-so-loyal subjects. His handling (or mishandling) of the Swift-Vets attack is a perfect example.



Kerry knew that the guys he maligned 30 years ago were still out there and that they had not forgotten or forgiven. Yet despite his knowledge of the impending ambush he would invite, with a salute and a Hollywood style ''reporting for duty,'' he chose to pour salt into a very deep old wound by using his four months in Vietnam as the centerpiece of his bid for the White House.



He knew they would attack his self-appointed hero status, but he thought the attack would be manageable. When the attack came, a pre-planned Clintonian defense strategy was launched, as if the American people would not see through the Lanny Davis strategy and pick up on the real issue behind the issue.



Immediately, the process of maligning those he had maligned once before began. Efforts were under way to convince voters that Kerry’s truth was the real truth, and that those 254 fellow veterans, each and every one, were simply lying. This wouldn’t work anywhere else on earth, but in American politics-post-Clinton, fiction often becomes fact and anything is possible.



The plan was set in motion and next came the letter from the law offices representing the Democratic National Committee and the Kerry campaign, not written to the Swift Vets threatening legal action for libel of their client, but to television and radio networks across the country that were set to air the Vets' first ad. They were ignoring the charges themselves, and his accusers, and attacking an innocent group who would only be the messenger.



Next was phase-three of the plan, turning the Swift Vets' attack into a Bush-lead conspiracy, and attempting to draw Bush’s National Guard service into question, a process they had already started when DNC Chairman Terry McAuliffe floated the idea that Bush was AWOL in Alabama, evidenced by the fact that he can’t prove he wasn’t. Still, Kerry offered no direct response to the charges, although by now, facts were beginning to quietly drip out through his handlers. Maybe that Cambodian Christmas seared into Kerry’s memory was just the fog of war.



Enter phase-four of the plan, filing a legal complaint with the FEC accusing the Bush campaign of that which the Kerry campaign had already been caught doing, working with a 527. In a swift shift of position, all of the sudden it was Kerry, who was challenging the legitimacy of 527 activities, the very team who for months earlier, defended the use of 527’s. Again, no direct response to the charges, though more information continued to drip. Maybe that first Purple Heart scratch was self inflicted after all.



Then came phase-five, a call placed by Kerry to fellow veteran Bob Dole in which Dole suggested he talk directly to his accusers and apologize for his actions. That prompted a second call placed by Kerry directly to Swift Vet Robert ''Friar Tuck'' Brant, in which Kerry asked for his help in stopping the Vets, to which Brant responds, ''I am one of them.''



Meanwhile, fellow Democrat Sen. Tom Harkin of Iowa is sent out to further malign the enemy, calling Vice President Dick Cheney a ''coward'' for not serving in Vietnam at all, who had opted instead for deferment to attend college, not all that different from Bill Clinton, without the ''loathing the military'' part.



Turned away at every door, the BIG guns are brought out and former senator and real war hero, triple amputee Max Cleland of Georgia, complete with wheelchair, and the saved one, Jim Rassmann, made a secret (announced in advance to all networks) heartfelt pilgrimage to Crawford, Texas, on short notice to plead for the president’s mercy.



As anticipated, they were unable to see Bush at his Crawford ranch. It didn’t matter, that wasn’t the real purpose of the trip to begin with. What immediately followed was: a photo op of the two veterans being rejected at a Crawford checkpoint, and it went exactly as planned.



Now this is a lot of work just to avoid answering the charges of a few fellow veterans directly, publicly, which brings me to the point of this article.



John Kerry’s biggest problem is John Kerry. He can’t run on his Senate career because his voting record is opposite to his campaign rhetoric. He can’t run on his ability to run anything, a company, a state, a municipality, a Girl Scout troop, because he has never run anything. And now, he can’t run on his self-proclaimed hero status because despite the fact that he has a dozen or so willing to stand with him in this effort, there are more than 250 standing opposed, and they won’t go away.



There’s more: former POW’s tortured with his pictures and words in captivity have a September surprise of their own for Kerry.



Kerry’s implosion is completely self-inflicted and it was completely predictable. Snared by his own web of lies and cornered by all the bridges he burned over the years, he is in serious trouble.



His most fatal fault is his belief that the American people are unable to absorb or comprehend what they see with their own eyes.



He is hoping against hope that voters will not notice that despite all of his triangulated efforts to fend off his attackers, they are growing in number and strength. Kerry is depending on the American people not noticing that through his barrage of counter attacks, he has yet to answer a single charge.



What little information has dripped out thus far supports the Swift-Vet charges: not really in Cambodia for Christmas, and at least one of the wounds may have been self-inflicted.



Hardcore Deaniacs, Socialist Party members, anti-war, anti-capitalist, and anti-American voters couldn’t care less about any of this. They are upset by the self-imposed implosion of their ''anybody but Bush'' candidate, and are more than happy to accept Kerry’s triangulation of the issue and his avoidance of his accusers at face value.



But the rest of America is getting a good look at what this guy is really all about. The DNC has been saying for months that Americans just needed to get to know John Kerry.



Well, now they are…



To: American Spirit who wrote (1692)9/30/2004 8:35:19 AM
From: JakeStraw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3515
 
Yes unAmerican SpiritChaser, We all know YOU are a troubled, over-weight, immature lonely women with no lifenad a huge sick Kerry fetish, who for some strange reason chose to post under the guise of being a man. Now go get yourself some professional help!



To: American Spirit who wrote (1692)9/30/2004 8:43:11 AM
From: Proud_Infidel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3515
 
I am pretty noticeable on the internet.

Are you the original dancing baby?



To: American Spirit who wrote (1692)9/30/2004 8:44:31 AM
From: JeffA  Respond to of 3515
 
Barbara Streisand?!



To: American Spirit who wrote (1692)9/30/2004 9:15:55 AM
From: Peter Dierks  Respond to of 3515
 
Danni Ashe?



To: American Spirit who wrote (1692)9/30/2004 10:35:23 AM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3515
 
Oh, it's you. Hi Teresa! You've been keeping a low profile.